Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offical Grammy thread aka Katy Perrys big tatas

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Herbert The Love Bug Newbie

Herbert The Love Bug

Posted
Posted

The Grammy's are such a fuging joke that celebrate entertainers NOT musicians. Whenever they celebrates and reward real musicians I may watch. I couldn't care less about all the kidz bop lip-synching rainbow looking entertainers that get rewarded because they can dance and sing songs other people wrote for them. Such bullshit and a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Herbert The Love Bug Newbie

Herbert The Love Bug

Posted
Posted

Okay I have forced myself to watch it for the Levon Helm tribute and I'm glad I have set through all the crap. Jack White is a fuging GOD first of all. Like O.M.G. But when they showed Andy Griffith and Doc Watson I cried. Then I cried some more during during the LEvon Helm tribute. Love seeing some of my heroes get the recognition they deserve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

The Grammy's are such a fuging joke that celebrate entertainers NOT musicians. Whenever they celebrates and reward real musicians I may watch. I couldn't care less about all the kidz bop lip-synching rainbow looking entertainers that get rewarded because they can dance and sing songs other people wrote for them. Such bullshit and a waste of time.

Pull you pants up higher old man...the Grammys are never about musicianship but a celebration of pop music: which I hate most of as well.

I always see some value in it as the Jack White performance..and I like the Black Keys and Lumineers.

I just accept it will have a ton of crap but if I accept it on the front end I can at least sit and tolerate a song about Forrest Gump...or can I?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saX man Mentor

saX man

Posted
Posted

Good show minus Frank Ocean and Taylor Swift. Don't get me wrong, Ocean is talented but that performance drained the energy from the show. "GuuuuUmp"

Happy to see Mumford, Jack White, Black Keys, & Alabama Shakes being recognized. One of the more rock heavy grammy's in a while (which is a gooood thing)

Jack White, the Levon tribute, and Sting-Bruno were definitely the best. Black Keys were rock solid as always. Overall, better than I expected. I thought that annoying indie band Fun. was gonna sweep haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Johnstonny
      Ekwonu doesn’t get dog walked under 2 minutes in the 4th, we drive, kick a FG and win

      By Johnstonny · Posted

      Icky is a marshmellow....
    • UnluckyforSome
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...