Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Davis reaffirms he is the biggest idiot in sports media


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Is it so hard to look and see that we re-signed Dwan Edwards who had a good year as a three technique? It is amazing to me to see that so many of these "experts" that do this for a living continue to fail to see the obvious. We could rush the passer last year on defense. We struggled stopping the run. Star was the obvious choice for our needs and that is especially the case when you looked at our roster prior to tonight.

But yes, lets reach for Patterson Davis and Billick...considering the guy fell to the end of the first and there was apparently no reason for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I understand the need for a receiving complement, but DT has been a problem area for far too long and aside from spending big money on a bona fide DT in FA, the Panthers made absolutely every effort to patch it up to no avail, notwithstanding the fact that Star is a better value at 14 than any WR you can think of in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The smile on the faces of Rivera and Gettleman say otherwise. Charles Davis has never been a good analyst period.

I'd say that's being a bit too kind. I've always said, he is the most difficult to listen to and the most ignorant sounding person in football. At his best, all he does is regurgitate hype that others have already started. When he's not doing that, he's slinging poo against the wall that's so out of left field I can do nothing but chuckle at how stupid he sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offensive league, Cam is our franchise, and Smith is old.....nothing wrong with them saying we need a WR.

Also nothing wrong with them saying looking in the 2nd round and later isn't where you find impact WRs....and that strategy hasn't worked for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so with a draft deep at WR we should reach for one in the 1st.................gotcha!

But we always pick a 2nd or 3rd draft tier draft WR....that was there point I think. That generally leaves you with a Brandon LaFell type. More of a JAG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you even listen to what they said? It wasn't so bad. So he thought Richardson was a better fit for what we do, so what! Regarding Smitty, he was pretty much on point as far as I'm concerned. You do have to remember that these are national analysts, not diehard fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...