Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Davis reaffirms he is the biggest idiot in sports media


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Is it so hard to look and see that we re-signed Dwan Edwards who had a good year as a three technique? It is amazing to me to see that so many of these "experts" that do this for a living continue to fail to see the obvious. We could rush the passer last year on defense. We struggled stopping the run. Star was the obvious choice for our needs and that is especially the case when you looked at our roster prior to tonight.

But yes, lets reach for Patterson Davis and Billick...considering the guy fell to the end of the first and there was apparently no reason for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I understand the need for a receiving complement, but DT has been a problem area for far too long and aside from spending big money on a bona fide DT in FA, the Panthers made absolutely every effort to patch it up to no avail, notwithstanding the fact that Star is a better value at 14 than any WR you can think of in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The smile on the faces of Rivera and Gettleman say otherwise. Charles Davis has never been a good analyst period.

I'd say that's being a bit too kind. I've always said, he is the most difficult to listen to and the most ignorant sounding person in football. At his best, all he does is regurgitate hype that others have already started. When he's not doing that, he's slinging poo against the wall that's so out of left field I can do nothing but chuckle at how stupid he sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offensive league, Cam is our franchise, and Smith is old.....nothing wrong with them saying we need a WR.

Also nothing wrong with them saying looking in the 2nd round and later isn't where you find impact WRs....and that strategy hasn't worked for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so with a draft deep at WR we should reach for one in the 1st.................gotcha!

But we always pick a 2nd or 3rd draft tier draft WR....that was there point I think. That generally leaves you with a Brandon LaFell type. More of a JAG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you even listen to what they said? It wasn't so bad. So he thought Richardson was a better fit for what we do, so what! Regarding Smitty, he was pretty much on point as far as I'm concerned. You do have to remember that these are national analysts, not diehard fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is "Keep Pounding." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45498715/nfl-carolina-panthers-chuba-hubbard-olympics-flag-football-track
    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
×
×
  • Create New...