Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Da'Rick Rogers gets no second chances per Marrone


top dawg

Recommended Posts

 

per rotoworld:

 

Bills coach Doug Marrone said the signing of undrafted rookie WR Da'Rick Rogers is a "one-shot deal."
"Either you've learned your lesson and you've grown up and you're going to go forward and mature, or you haven't learned your lesson and you're going to be out on the street," Marrone said. "It's that simple. It's all on you, and you have to make the right decisions." The slightest slip-up and Rogers is going to get his walking papers. If he keeps his head on straight, Rogers has a legitimate shot to carve out a prominent offensive role as a rookie. May 11 - 4:54 PM

 

 

 

I didn't even realize that the kid wasn't drafted. He must have really been a screw-up. Now he has his opportunity. It's all up to him. Zero tolerance for off-field bullshit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

their draft was quite good for them.  my buddy is a die hard and he is pumped.  i mean shoot if manuel, woods and rogers pan out they could be really good very soon.  their o line is good and d line are beast as well.  

 

 

what did he do exactly?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

their draft was quite good for them.  my buddy is a die hard and he is pumped.  i mean shoot if manuel, woods and rogers pan out they could be really good very soon.  their o line is good and d line are beast as well.  

 

 

what did he do exactly?

 

got arrested, and failed several drug test. also heard he was a bad teammate, still worth a shot in the later rounds because the skill level is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guys has about a 5% chance of being in the league in 2 years.

Glad we did not waste a pick on him.

 

that can be said about a lot of draft picks.and it wouldnt be because of talent, in football you have to take chances.even when building a roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guys has about a 5% chance of being in the league in 2 years.

Glad we did not waste a pick on him.

 

 

that can be said about a lot of draft picks.and it wouldnt be because of talent, in football you have to take chances.even when building a roster.

 

Yeah, to me, the thing is that we have needed an injection of serious talent at WR for years, so at least they could have made getting his agent on the phone a priority once the draft ended. Hell, in retrospect, he should have probably been the first guy we called.  This wouldn't have even cost us a draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look if the Bengal's passed on him every round his off field stuff must be wayyyy more than just some weed incidents.

He has talent but I had major pause on him when Todd Mcshay mentioned his run ins with drugs..and his "troubled background" ..he never went into much detail but it seemed he got some major details from a few teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look if the Bengal's passed on him every round his off field stuff must be wayyyy more than just some weed incidents.

He has talent but I had major pause on him when Todd Mcshay mentioned his run ins with drugs..and his "troubled background" ..he never went into much detail but it seemed he got some major details from a few teams.

 

 

His off field troubles were bad, but was was really damning for him was that he had just as many on field issues as well. Like not running routes the right way on purpose, not running correct routes, giving up on plays if he wasn't involved as the intended target......ext..... 

 

 

Pretty much.... he's a head case with talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...