Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star Trek: into darkness

CarolinaCoolin

By CarolinaCoolin,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted

Saw the movie last night with my girlfriend and it was amazing! If you liked the first or just like Star Trek in general you'll love it. J.j Abrams does a great job staying true to the franchise but still revamps it. It's visually breathe taking. I'm younger so I never really saw the original show but I loved the new one and it could make anyone regardless if you've seen the show or not like it. My girlfriend hates science fiction movies but loved this one. I liken it to how batman begins went into dark knight. You have batman begins as the set up movie introducing you to characters and places and concepts then you have the second movie were you can really explore and build on top of it. It's great if you saw it let me know what you guys thought and if you haven't check it out. So worth it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugor Hill Collaborator

Hugor Hill

Posted
Posted

I saw it last night, and I gotta say it was better than the first one IMHO. And Alice Eve was smoking hot throughout the movie.

 

Khan was a great reveal, as I didn't know going in that he was going to be the villain. The actor playing him did a great job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I saw it last night, and I gotta say it was better than the first one IMHO. And Alice Eve was smoking hot throughout the movie.

Khan was a great reveal, as I didn't know going in that he was going to be the villain. The actor playing him did a great job.

Yeah loved the reveal. Much better then the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

I would say it was better than the first, and that isn't a knock on the first at all because it was good. This one just picks up right where it left off and opens up the Star Trek universe even more, bringing with it that nostalgia.

I highly recommend it, J.J. Abrams knows his poo. I'm already looking forward to the next one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat Newbie

Cat

Posted
Posted

Saw it this morning and LOVED it!!

We've been watching the original series with my 6 year old and he watched the first Star Trek Movie this weekend. It was awesome that he knew all the characters going into it. And he understands the whole parallel time line thing going on. It's the first movie he's watched in theatres that he didn't ask if we could leave.

Can't wait for the next one.

edit: and yes Sherlock did a great job ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Panthers Preseason

      By frankw · Posted

      Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • CRA
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By CRA · Posted

      A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • WUnderhill
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...