Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Numbers Game


Zuck Fod

Recommended Posts

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9441252/bill-barnwell-breaks-2012-numbers-get-feel-2013

 

An interesting article on which teams will make the biggest improvements this season. Not a whole lot of Panther talk but love how the article ends with a big improvement expected from the Panthers.

 

 

And, finally, the Panthers still managed to go a dismal 1-7 in one-score games last year, with the heartbreaking loss to the Falcons sticking in my memory as a notable defeat.

 

 

 

I'll be discussing these teams more at length as the year goes along, but at the moment, it appears that the numbers would expect a steep decline from the Colts and a moderate one from the Vikings, with big steps from the Lions and Panthers in their stead. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eventually, luck (the noun, not the player) evens out at 50/50.  We have been on the loosing end of "WTF" so often over the last 2 years, I have to believe that maybe we can have some swing our way this year.

As someone once said, "Know what the difference between hitting .250 and .300 is? It's 25 hits. 25 hits in 500 at bats is 50 points, okay? There's 6 months in a season, that's about 25 weeks. That means if you get just one extra flare a week - just one - a gorp... you get a groundball, you get a groundball with eyes... you get a dying quail, just one more dying quail a week... and you're in Yankee Stadium."

 

My point is...there's not much difference between just barely loosing and just barely winning.

 

We are due.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That feeling of disbelief when Roddy caught that pass, then we let them get extra yards for fg range. I felt nothing. Completely silent with rage building in me. I just took a nap after that game because of how pissed I was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eventually, luck (the noun, not the player) evens out at 50/50.  We have been on the loosing end of "WTF" so often over the last 2 years, I have to believe that maybe we can have some swing our way this year.

As someone once said, "Know what the difference between hitting .250 and .300 is? It's 25 hits. 25 hits in 500 at bats is 50 points, okay? There's 6 months in a season, that's about 25 weeks. That means if you get just one extra flare a week - just one - a gorp... you get a groundball, you get a groundball with eyes... you get a dying quail, just one more dying quail a week... and you're in Yankee Stadium."

 

My point is...there's not much difference between just barely loosing and just barely winning.

 

We are due.

 

Nice Quote from Bull Durham.  One of my favorite scenes from that movie.

 

And so true....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this.  wasnt it last year that we lost the first 10 coin flips against all odds?  This team has to work harder than every other team because of bad juju.

 

It was 17 coin flips.

 

Around a 1 in 150000 chance of happening.

 

 

Unreal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There may be something to say about all the other games we lost by means of execution, but the ending of that first Atlanta game was such an improbable kick in the dick that it'll probably never happen again

 

I love the optimism but the problem with getting kicked in the dick is you never see it coming.  I think the comment is spot on though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black cat mascot, ridiculously bad luck for a while now, and 0-13 (17 if you count the preseason I guess) on coin flips.

 

Well it's unlucky year number 13 (2013), it's time for us to fuging shine with that bad luck black cat mascot.  It's also our 10-year anniversary since our Super Bowl year, let's do this poo.

 

Oh yeah, not sure if anyone has said anything about this yet... but we've historically had our best seasons after a 7-9 year.  All four of our winning seasons where we finished 12-4, 11-5, 11-5, and 12-4 we were 7-9 the year before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...