Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A couple thoughts about our preseason offense


CRA

Recommended Posts

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda agree. I mean Fua played forever with the first team. I haven't seen many screens to take advantage of the blitzing defenders either. We will see a bit more game 3 of preseason because the team needs some offensive production and confidence, but we won't be doing anything cutting edge and innovative until week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

1st time I've agreed with you in a long time.

 

We've shown nothing and pretty much ran vanilla stuff to evaluate players.

 

No QB dives, Bootlegs or Play action in the Red Zone. All are parts of our Red Zone packages.

 

No Read option or Smoke screens to Smitty which are a big part of this offense.

 

Vanilla Zone and Man coverage with simple blitzes and Dline stunts on Defense. We all know Mcdermont and Rivera got more schemes for this defense then they are showing in the preseason.

 

If people would take the time and look they would see we are showing nothing in this preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Huddle. Some folks understand what is going on. Some are worried they are seeing a precursor to the regular season. Nothing anyone says will change anybodies mind.

 

I can only recall 2 screens. Both to Barner, and both from DA. Our RBs catch plenty of passes when our O is clicking.

 

We have used zero misdirection, read option, or anything other than off tackle or up the gut.

 

We are using no motion and running basic routes.

 

In other words. Our O is as vanilla as it can get.

 

On D, we are mixing and matching personnel with an eye on evaluation. Very few blitzes or stunts.

 

Running basic cover 2 and zone. Very little man to man, or bump and run. Putting no pressure on the CBs.

 

In short. The D is pretty much as vanilla as it can get.

 

tldr version. It is the preseason. We are evaluating. It sucks for fans. But it is important for the coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st time I've agreed with you in a long time.

 

We've shown nothing and pretty much ran vanilla stuff to evaluate players.

 

No QB dives, Bootlegs or Play action in the Red Zone. All are parts of our Red Zone packages.

 

No Read option or Smoke screens to Smitty which are a big part of this offense.

 

Vanilla Zone and Man coverage with simple blitzes and Dline stunts on Defense. We all know Mcdermont and Rivera got more schemes for this defense then they are showing in the preseason.

 

If people would take the time and look they would see we are showing nothing in this preseason.

Beat me to it. Well said anyway. Bastar.... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Huddle. Some folks understand what is going on. Some are worried they are seeing a precursor to the regular season. Nothing anyone says will change anybodies mind.

 

I can only recall 2 screens. Both to Barner, and both from DA. Our RBs catch plenty of passes when our O is clicking.

 

We have used zero misdirection, read option, or anything other than off tackle or up the gut.

 

We are using no motion and running basic routes.

 

In other words. Our O is as vanilla as it can get.

 

On D, we are mixing and matching personnel with an eye on evaluation. Very few blitzes or stunts.

 

Running basic cover 2 and zone. Very little man to man, or bump and run. Putting no pressure on the CBs.

 

In short. The D is pretty much as vanilla as it can get.

 

tldr version. It is the preseason. We are evaluating. It sucks for fans. But it is important for the coaches.

 

Hubby gets it. Good post a lot more in dept then mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hubby gets it. Good post a lot more in dept then mine.

You covered it well enough. Petty amazing we both pretty much said the same thing at pretty much the same time though.

I saw this thread started by CRA and was not expecting a rational well thought out post that didn't have any negative connotations to it. I was thinking, here we go again.

But hey, even CRA gets it. Who'd a thunk it. Just kidding.

I know the players want to win. The coaches do as well. But I also know that finding out who can, or can't, do what, is more important. Unfortunately, most fans see the bad, and that is what they take away from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You covered it well enough. Petty amazing we both pretty much said the same thing at pretty much the same time though.

I saw this thread started by CRA and was not expecting a rational well thought out post that didn't have any negative connotations to it. I was thinking, here we go again.

But hey, even CRA gets it. Who'd a thunk it. Just kidding.

I know the players want to win. The coaches do as well. But I also know that finding out who can, or can't, do what, is more important. Unfortunately, most fans see the bad, and that is what they take away from it.

 

Yeah crazy concept. Trying to evaluate players at the bottom of your roster in games that don't count.

 

 

 

Side Note: I thought CRA was going that way when I saw the thread 1st to.

 

It's nice to see him looking at it in terms of what a actual Coaching staff looks for in the Preseason.

 

I can see the difference in the Gettlemen's influence to Preseason compare to Hurney's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about the OL being garbage....

Why else isn't it moving? And are they trying to put Cam in tough scenarios (learning opportunity) with a healthy combo of showing the league nothing?

Zero read options

1 half ass run by Cam

4 play actions out of 40 plus snaps....our actual offense is built on various forms of play action

There are lots of reasons why we aren't clicking on O....but I highly doubt the goal is to click. Other wise we would be using play action, Cam running etc. They likely are just practicing basics to see how guys perform in what are likely non ideal scenarios...evaluating more than anything.

Give Ron this to date....our week 1 offense can't be predicted by preseason. He definitely holds his cards close

Very well said. The deal with preseason is to see who can play the right way. Who can fight through blocks the right way, who stays in the right lanes, who can make the right block, who runs the right route the right way, and most importantly, who can do their job the right way?

Keeping the plays simple is the best way to evaluate. That way the coaches know exactly what they are looking at/for. They are looking for players that can get the job done, and do it the right way.

Some teams use preseason as practice. They run all their plays and don't care who knows it. Rivera is old school, as you well know, he likes to keep it simple and evaluate every player from a small pool of plays. Not running a hundred plays makes evaluation easier.

Ah hellz, its late. I'm done preaching. Good thread starter. Even if it was not expected. I really thought you were going to find something negative to harp over. Thanks for a thread worth getting involved in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...