Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When we pick up an O-lineman....


Recommended Posts

At this point, it should be a given that we'll be bringing someone in after the first round of cuts. Question is...what position?

Future cap situation being what it is, I'm assuming we'll only make one signing. So, which position needs to be upgraded more?

Nothing is a given. if it's not done, its a throw away season. The Red can suck it i'm saying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I don't think picking up a lineman (or two) will be enough. They would have to be proper vets. The entire chemistry of the line is way off. They're all bumping into each other and wandering around like headless chickens.  Guard pulls are painfully hilarious to watch with this team...I would hate to see what a screen pass would look like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of our writers were tweeting that Amini remained in full pads and it didn't seem too serious. Hopefully that is the case but figured I would let you know. I am more worried about Barner at this point as far as seriousness of injury goes.

Well that is good news....

And I agree about Barner....with poor OL play the small quick RB might be the best RB on the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...