Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barner over Williams


Zod

Recommended Posts

I am worried we may not see J-Stew this season.

 

This is what I'm most afraid of when it comes to the running game given the O-Line woes.

 

Having both healthy and Cam as a running threat is about the only thing that makes for a complete backfield.  J-Stew and D-Will are both very one-sided backs.  Always have been.

 

Given things as they are, Tolbert may actually have more success.  Barner, maybe.  He needs experience, and boy, it looks like he's gonna get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this ends up being a twofold decision.

 

It's no disrespect to DWill because with a halfway fug-worthy OL he's a WAY better back, BUT!  Barner, by virtue of his young bullheaded "hit the first hole as hard as you can" style will gain more yards behind the piss poor one we have.  This will earn him more carries than he might have received if we had said fug-worthy OL.

 

Trick is DWill is the better pass protector and we DO have that piss poor OL.  DWill will have to still get enough carries that him being in doesn't scream "yo they're passing" so the probably outcome is roughly the same split that DWill and JStew had when we weren't trying to force one of them to be the "starter"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DWill/Stew<anybody else.

 

An argument as old as the chicken vs the egg on the Huddle

Same answer, Hurney stupidity gave DWill a contract any player in the NFL would gladly sign.

The Panthers will continue to try and get some value out of our previously brain dead GM's contracts given to DWill and DStew.

Patience is the only answer until this albatross is raised from the Offenses' backs (pun intended).

Barner is a specialist, and must be put in situations he can succeed in, the rest of the RB corp must do their part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gain positive yards consistently.

 

Come on dude.  You have seen a lot of NFL games.  Who was going to gain yards against some of those penetrations last night? Barry Sanders and um.no one else.   Yeah Barner may have had a few more positive yard plays, but to say it was because of Barner skills and not because of the defense?  No one but Cam was going to run anywhere that night.  There were 0 holes.  Not to the outside or inside.  Look at that third and 1 play,  There were 3 Ravens within 1 yard of the handoff.  

 

The line was so bad last night, when we ran a screen play it looked like the regular offensive line blocking scheme.  If there were legitimate holes and Williams just wasn't hitting them I would be all for putting in whomever ran better.  But that is simply not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some of you are missing the point.

 

DWill is *clearly* the more talented back and he's the better back if he has any blocking at all.

 

The question is a worse back with a better style for playing behind a shitty OL a better option to be playing right now.  The net worth might be higher in spite of the lower actual value of the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams - .5 yards per carry

Barner - 3.5 yards per carry

Yeah, I am way off base.

Zod .. come on now .. really?

You've seen dude in 3 preseason games against mostly second and third string defenses ..

didn't expect a post like this from you ..

unless..

you're trolling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zod .. come on now .. really?

You've seen dude in 3 preseason games against mostly second and third string defenses ..

didn't expect a post like this from you ..

unless..

you're trolling?

 

Nope. I feel Barner can get more behind a bad offensive line than Deangelo, as shown last night.

 

Deangelo may be a better back given adequate space, but he isn't getting that anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...