Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game Grades - Seahawks at Panthers


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

huh?

 

Godfrey looks like the exact same player he has always been, a subpar safety.

 

He was late and took terrible angles. It's fuggin inexcusable at this point in his career.

 

And I'm being tough on Dwill, but he did have two fumbles, one of them lost us the game. The other easily could've took a lucky bounce and changed the game even earlier on.

 

These guy's aren't fugging rookies anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Godfrey looks like the exact same player he has always been, a subpar safety.

 

He was late and took terrible angles. It's fuggin inexcusable at this point in his career.

 

And I'm being tough on Dwill, but he did have two fumbles, one of them lost us the game. The other easily could've took a lucky bounce and changed the game even earlier on.

 

These guy's aren't fugging rookies anymore.

I'm too tired to beat the Godfrey drum any longer.....that is why he got moved to SS. Godfrey is forever late giving help to a CB. I just think Godfrey has a low football IQ....bc he has the physical tools to be good. He just never can get where he needs to be consistantly when in the FS role.

I prefer him as a blitzing fleshbomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the secondary was not good at all.  They allowed too many people uncovered.  I think it might be scheme.  They would put one guy out wide and 2 guys in the slot and we tried to cover the 2 inside guys with one corner  five yards back and Godfrey 15 yards  back. The linebacker wasn't covering them past 6 to 8 yards given the focus on stopping the run. We just weren't fundamentally sound.  That needs to get fixed.  Can't give them more than a C-.  How many passed did we break up or intercept?  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the secondary was not good at all.  They allowed too many people uncovered.  I think it might be scheme.  They would put one guy out wide and 2 guys in the slot and we tried to cover the 2 inside guys with one corner  five yards back and Godfrey 15 yards  back. The linebacker wasn't covering them past 6 to 8 yards given the focus on stopping the run. We just weren't fundamentally sound.  That needs to get fixed.  Can't give them more than a C-.  How many passed did we break up or intercept?  

 

Allowed 12 points to a team that normally scores 30+.

 

Don't sweat the small stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
    • Thank God we are inthe NFC South--
    • When Sanders was named as an alternate, I was all like, "That's a big ol bowl of NOPE."   In my view, they would be better off showing a documentary on the 32 "man of the year" candidates to show what they do for charities etc.  
×
×
  • Create New...