Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera stats


panther4life

Recommended Posts

10 4th quarter blown leads.

2-14 in games decide by a TD or less

0-3 in game openers

0-4 against rookie head coaches ( not couting saints interim coaches)

5 of his 13 wins are against backup QB's (Curtis painter,T.J Yates, Nick Foles , John Beck, and the raiders were down to Matt Leinart and Terelle Pryor as Palmer was injured after 8 snaps) that equals 38% of his wins

2 wins came against the saints led by their interim head coaches

8 of his 13 wins came against head coaches who no longer had that job the next year(includes the 2 saints interim head coach wins)

The 5 exceptions were Mike Smith,Mike Shannahan x 2,Dennis Allen and Gary Kubiak. 3 of which had to play backup QB's against us due to injuries.

In 2011 we were 1-7 against playoff teams. The single win coming against the Texans led by their backup QB T.J Yates

In 2012 we were 2-4 against playoff teams (beat the Falcons and Skins)

Only 2 coaches who lost against Rivera with their starting QB's to retain their job the following season are Mike Smith(who Rivera is 1-3 against) and Mike Shannahan who lost to us last year with RG 3 starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope and pray they have a contingency plan in place for the bye if we have another meltdown this week. Not sure I can sit through another season of Rivera magic.

 

You know, I'm one of those people that always watch our games 3 or 4 times to get a better feel for individual performances, etc. Due to technical difficulties, I couldn't watch the 1st half against Buffalo and frankly wish those difficulties had prevented me from seeing the 2nd half. Afterward, I had zero desire to ever watch that game again. In the same vein, I can no longer watch the post game pressers, as all they do is leave me more pissed off. I'm sure many feel the same.

 

We have to get rid of the disease known as Ron Rivera. We just have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...