Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case of Mike Tolbert


saX man

Recommended Posts

Mike-Tolberts-New-Uniform.jpg

 

Ok people, I want to take a sec and focus on Mike Tolbert

 

Last year, I'll admit it seemed to be a slow start initially but once we started including him in the game plan more and actually had set plays for him to work with, we had a lot of our wins. I'm not saying one change can get us winning but this seems like an obvious player to include more in our plans.    

 

Feel free to check out this game log below and also think about those games.  At the end of the day, he's one of our best chain movers on offense.  He's a bowling ball capable of running and catching.  

 

Beyond Ginn & Olsen right now and given Smitty's aging deal, this guy needs to be used more.  

 

I mentioned in another thread he had 39 targets last season.  He has *5 through 4 games.  

 

Game Log: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TolbMi00/gamelog/2012/

 

Feel free to let me know what you think about his impact. Agree/Disagree/Cam Newton talk  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Tolbert benefits from being the third running back. A change of pace from both DWill and JStew. However, this season he hasn't had the change to make a real difference because of stew being out bs Barner being a non factor.

Also, letting Shockey walk so we could sign. Tolbert to fi the hole of a 2ns TE was one of the dumbest things this team has ever done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your O line can't block, someone needs to stay back in pass protection.

I guess we could run a wishbone, with Brockel, Hartsock and Tolbert in the backfield with Cam. That would allow the D to double both Smitty and Olsen.

Bottom line: bad O line + worse OC = players not reaching potential

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your O line can't block, someone needs to stay back in pass protection.

I guess we could run a wishbone, with Brockel, Hartsock and Tolbert in the backfield with Cam. That would allow the D to double both Smitty and Olsen.

Bottom line: bad O line + worse OC = players not reaching potential

 

fair point.  The OL is just killing us no matter who we have at OC and we happen to have a bad OC haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your O line can't block, someone needs to stay back in pass protection.

I guess we could run a wishbone, with Brockel, Hartsock and Tolbert in the backfield with Cam. That would allow the D to double both Smitty and Olsen.

Bottom line: bad O line + worse OC = players not reaching potential

Bring back the Philly full house!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I mentioned in another thread he had 39 targets last season.  He has 4 through 4 games.  

 

Game Log: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TolbMi00/gamelog/2012/

 

Feel free to let me know what you think about his impact. Agree/Disagree/Cam Newton talk  

 

Basically disagree

 

1) He is well ahead of pace in carries and yards this year compared to last

2) His receiving has always been spotty. He will have plenty of 0 and 1 reception games and then a few 3 and 4. He will probably get a few higher reception games.

 

If anything we are utilizing him more based on total plays and touches. Catches for a player in his role will come and go.

 

Also he has 5 targets this year with 4 receptions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...