Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Jekyll and Hyde Panthers......

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted

They played a complete game today just like the Giants game.....then they drink that damn potion and the Hyde side emerges and they can't get out of their own way.Whatever you may say of RR as a head coach......he has built a good defense and that has always been his trademark,and he showed some stones by going on fourth down and actually producing points.Then Mike Shula calls a good game and the players do what they are paid to do....we we win.I am hoping that they can finally gain some traction and get on a roll. Maybe they can stop the split personality disorder and find a team identity now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherGuy Community Regular

PantherGuy

Posted
Posted

Meanwhile in Denver, the Jags are giving the Broncos a run for their money.

There are no really bad teams in the NFL.

 

I wouldn't say the Jags are giving the Broncos a run for their money. The Broncos are winning 35-19. I admit I'm not watching the game, and you might be, so I could be wrong. But by the look of the score, it doesn't really look to me like the Jags are all that competitive with the Broncos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't say the Jags are giving the Broncos a run for their money. The Broncos are winning 35-19. I admit I'm not watching the game, and you might be, so I could be wrong. But by the look of the score, it doesn't really look to me like the Jags are all that competitive with the Broncos.

At one point it was 20-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...