Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blackmon available for trade? EDIT: blackmon suspended for season


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

it is a guy who has a sickness. addiction has nothing to do with stupidity, and everything to do with sickness. we all can sit here and say he is dumb, but it is obvious that this guy is ill. he needs some sort of medical help, that is not weed.

It us not a sickness. Dude made conscious decisions to put drugs into his system. Continuing to call it a sickness deflects blame from the only one who is to blame...him.

Calling using drugs an illness is an insult to those suffering from sicknesses that had nothing to do with their own stupid decisions...cancer, diabetes, ms, md, etc. those are illnesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, not all situations are the same. For some, it might be akin to a disease, for others it might be stupidity.

You choose to do drugs. I don't consider that a disease. Now, once they are addicted it is a bitch to stop and mist people do need help to get clean. But, that still does not make it a disease.

The blame for anyone who chooses to use drugs is all on the individual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You choose to do drugs. I don't consider that a disease. Now, once they are addicted it is a bitch to stop and mist people do need help to get clean. But, that still does not make it a disease.

The blame for anyone who chooses to use drugs is all on the individual.

Is it always on the individual? I have known people who grew up in a household in which drug and alcohol was so common that they likely had little or no ability to understand the choices they were making. They think of the abuse as normal behavior.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think of addiction as similar to some disease such as cancer. But it can in some cases, be compared to mental diseases.

Btw, regarding Blackmon, listening to his statement made it seem as if he missed a treatment session or something of that sort. If that is the case, then its definitely stupidity on his part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it always on the individual? I have known people who grew up in a household in which drug and alcohol was so common that they likely had little or no ability to understand the choices they were making. They think of the abuse as normal behavior.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think of addiction as similar to some disease such as cancer. But it can in some cases, be compared to mental diseases.

Btw, regarding Blackmon, listening to his statement made it seem as if he missed a treatment session or something of that sort. If that is the case, then its definitely stupidity on his part.

I 100% agree with you that many addicts grew up in homes where drug and alcohol abuse was prevalent . And, that does make it much more likely that they will in turn amuse drugs. I just don't consider that an illness...I consider it a learned behavior.

I also believe that many who suffer from legit illnesses such as depression, mental illness, etc often turn to drugs to try and cope/escape.

I also understand how hard it is to quit and that most people do need help to kick it...my younger brother has battled drug abuse for nearly 30 years. But, he will also tell you that it us no one's fault but his win for the place where he us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading madhatter apply his default "BOOTSTRAPS" mentality to substance abuse, when there's ample evidence for anybody who knows how to enter a search query on just how complex chemical dependency gets both physiologically and mentally is like watching them try to implement the javelin throw at the special olympics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the most basic aspect of an addiction is that it's not a choice. if you could simply say "hey i shouldn't do this anymore, so i'll stop" then it's not really an addiction. plenty of addicts know it's screwing up their life, they want to stop, they TRY to stop, but they can't. outside professional help is usually needed and even then it's not certain that they'll beat it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
    • Good response. In reference to your second paragraph, many Huddlers are just haters when it comes to certain people. 
    • Anything is possible, but neither guy was as special as Luke whose superpower was diagnosing plays pre-snap. He was the best to ever do that. I'll argue with anyone who tries to tell me otherwise. But if Morgan, whose reputation for hard hits and high production,  and particularly Beason, who was markedly more productive than Morgan than Morgan, hadn't caught prolific cases of the injury bug, they would've certainly been in legitimate Hall of Fame discussions. With the injuries, they're in "the best to never make it" discussions.  Luke's injuries did not knock his career of kilter. Luke was simply more consistent during his playing career than both Beason and Morgan, and, like I said, he had that uber-ability to diagnose plays which transcended even many if not most or all of his fellow Hall of Fame brethren at the position (i.e., he was on another level).
×
×
  • Create New...