Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Animal Cruelty

Jakob

By Jakob,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
Posted

Considering how well the last few times I asked for advice on the huddle went, I figured hey.. Why not try it again?

Recently my neighbors got a cat that started coming over into my yard and would fight with my cat. They had the nerve to ask if we could make our cat an indoor cat so their cat could roam the neighborhood. Trying to be nice to neighbors we explained our cat has been an indoor and outdoor cat for 8 years and we can't make him become an indoor cat full time.

So, three days after this happened my cat got a terrible sore on his side. I couldn't really tell what it was but, after a while it healed up. Not even a week later he got another one, this one was not as severe as the first one. It's been about two weeks and today I see him licking his back/thigh area... I could see he had another sore. Guess what I find embedded in his skin? A god damn pellet. I'm so furious right now. These scumbags have been shooting my fuging cat for the past few weeks trying to kill them. Trying to kill someone's animal is so so SO crossing the line.

My question is. How do I go about handling this? My whole family is going over to their house tomorrow to talk to them about it. Should we just call the police instead? I have no idea how I should legally handle this to make sure it won't happen again. I can't have it happen again. I'm not going to let my cat get shot to death because their cat can't stay in his yard like mine does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Are you sure they were the ones shooting your cat? Do you have evidence of it? The only reason I ask is that you'll want proof it was them, not just that they wanted your cat to stay inside.

No I'm not 100% sure but this is the only family on the block that doesn't know my cat.. I guess you could say we've had problems with this family before.

Nobody else owns an outdoor pet and I know for a fact they won a pellet gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

If there are multiple witnesses to the entire "Can you turn your cat into an indoor cat..." conversation, there is at least the circumstantial involvement.

 

I would think that even the biggest dickhead cops would be somewhat empathetic toward a defenseless animal.

 

Personally? Let me catch someone or know someone is maliciously and purposefully hurting, harming or otherwise mistreating an animal and I would, without hesitation, sacrifice my personal freedom to ensure that it was stopped, that it would not happen again and that the proper retribution is taken. I would not hesitate to inflict pain upon the person. The stupid shall be punished.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If there are multiple witnesses to the entire "Can you turn your cat into an indoor cat..." conversation, there is at least the circumstantial involvement.

I would think that even the biggest dickhead cops would be somewhat empathetic toward a defenseless animal.

Personally? Let me catch someone or know someone is maliciously and purposefully hurting, harming or otherwise mistreating an animal and I would, without hesitation, sacrifice my personal freedom to ensure that it was stopped, that it would not happen again and that the proper retribution is taken. I would not hesitate to inflict pain upon the person. The stupid shall be punished.

My whole family was witnesses to them asking if we can turn our cat into an indoor cat. So that's 5 of us.. I live in such a nice neighborhood. It's sad to see it go to poo.

I can't believe in the modern world we live in someone would shoot a persons pet over something this simple..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

Catch their cat and take it to the SPCA as a stray. Then burn their house down.

 

Yeah, probably don't want to do that...

 

http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/article.cfm?ID=23226

 

Doctor in the town I recently moved from. I know the victim personally and was on the board of the Martinsville-Henry County SPCA when this went down. Dude actually drove the dogs to Roanoke (50 miles away) and turned them over to an animal shelter, said he found them alongside the road. The dogs were chipped and, contrary to whet was stated by the doctor, his intent was to have both dogs euthanized because he didn't get along with his neighbor.

 

If he wasn't a fairly well known doctor, he'd still be in jail.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...