Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What about the old veteran WRs we did pass on, huh?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

2014 draft prospects? No.

2013 draft prospects... :unsure:

I agree. To use your favorite term, it's just "silly".

 

 

I'll give someone a few weeks weeks to whine and pine, but this is hardly the first week that Allen has shown what he's made of. We didn't pick him, we're not getting him. Let's discuss the guys that we can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Smith is ranked 127th, Brandon Lafell is ranked 137th, and Ted Ginn is ranked 142nd in dropped pass % in the NFL.

 

We don't have an unusual problem with drops.  We have had some at crucial times, but we have caught the ball really well.

 

We have had some trouble getting open, and we have had trouble giving Cam time, two things an improved O-Line would help with.

 

www.sportingcharts.com/nfl//stats/drops/2013

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We have had some trouble getting open, and we have had trouble giving Cam time, two things an improved O-Line would help with.

 

 

yes they can be but the first one can also be helped by getting a better group of WRs in here. this team has to improve the depth at that position as well as the OL. this team has tried to strike lighting twice by bringing in later round WRs thinking they will get another Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATL has great skill position players, how's that working out for them?

 

Come on, man. ATL went "all in" and risked their future by paying a king's ransom for one guy. Many NFL types realized that they could end up in hot water for lack of quality depth.  

 

Isn't it ironic that when the Falcons lost Julio Jones---their beastly WR---everyone knew that it was pretty much curtains for their season? But let's not try and act like Julio and Roddy aren't arguably the best WR tandem in football, and last year it showed.

 

Our FO has not bankrupted our future, and in fact has acquired decent depth on the D-line, at LB, and RB. If our defensive backfield continues to develop, and make some leaps, we just may have quality depth there as well. Even DA may be a better back-up QB than most. So I would argue that overall, we have better depth than the Falcons right now. Why wouldn't we continue to add the missing pieces, especially at WR, which can be the difference between being a perennial contender and a pretender?

 

Give me a valid reason as to why we shouldn't try to acquire a couple of WRs in this draft right now, since you seem to be arguing so  vociferously against it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting back on point, in light of our big, tall QB---all things being equal---I prefer a big, tall WR, but they don't grow on trees. That being said, I would still give Watkins or Lee their due diligence. Just like the ins and outs of the business side of football, I really haven't paid too much attention to draft prospects until late in the game. I couldn't (and can't) do anything about it anyway, so why even care? I guess the older that you get, you have to find more interests to spice things up. That being said, I know that most of the prospects won't be vetted out until after the Combine, Pro Days, and especially individual tem workouts, but at this moment I really am keenly interested in Brandon Coleman, Jaelen Strong, Donte Moncrief (thanks to someone repeatedly mentioning him ), Kevin Benjamin, and Jordan Matthews.

 

Mike Evans will probably be gone, but he looks a little "soft" to me anyway (meaning not physical or aggressive enough). Moncrief appears to have some swag (for what it's worth). I like Jaelen Strong's mix of size and speed, plus the kid seems to have a story behind him (his dad dying when he was young, and starting off in JC for academic reasons). He looks like a fairly smooth route runner with good hands. Benjamin looks a little raw, but with tons of potential, and Jordan Matthews looks the most pro-ready to me, though he may not be the speediest WR of the draft. But, like I said these are just general first impressions which may not mean a thing. I could change opinions whichever way the wind is blowing depending on what happens in the off-season. 

 

Feel free to express an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shiny first round RT giving Cam an extra second won't matter if his primary targets are still Smith (aging and shouldn't be a #1) and LaFell (perpetually covered and the antithesis of clutch). Ginn making it on the field here is less about a redemption story and more of a judgement on our WR group.

 

Atlanta was a missed call away from playing in the SB the last time they had their two WRs healthy, by the way. Not that we have anyone close to Julio's level, but as average as they are take away Smith and LaFell for the year and we're not sniffing .500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATL has great skill position players, how's that working out for them?

 

 

Come on, man. ATL went "all in" and risked their future by paying a king's ransom for one guy. Many NFL types realized that they could end up in hot water for lack of quality depth.  

 

Isn't it ironic that when the Falcons lost Julio Jones---their beastly WR---everyone knew that it was pretty much curtains for their season? But let's not try and act like Julio and Roddy aren't arguably the best WR tandem in football, and last year it showed.

 

Our FO has not bankrupted our future, and in fact has acquired decent depth on the D-line, at LB, and RB. If our defensive backfield continues to develop, and make some leaps, we just may have quality depth there as well. Even DA may be a better back-up QB than most. So I would argue that overall, we have better depth than the Falcons right now. Why wouldn't we continue to add the missing pieces, especially at WR, which can be the difference between being a perennial contender and a pretender?

 

Give me a valid reason as to why we shouldn't try to acquire a couple of WRs in this draft right now, since you seem to be arguing so  vociferously against it? 

 

Also, don't forget about Tavarres King and Marvin Mcnutt. I could argue that even our WR depth is better than ATL's from some perspective. We just have to acquire at least one receiver who needs to be staring at some time (preferably early) next year that is a legitimate threat on every down. 

 

It is my contention that we have the depth, we just don't have the starting caliber, big-play playmakers in front of that depth (if you understand what I'm saying).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...