Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The play calls at the end of the game were NOT playoff caliber


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I'm goddam tired of Mike Shula trying to make Cam Newton turn into Trent Fugging Dilfer.

 

Thank god Cam has so much talent that it breaks out of the concrete Shula continually puts him into anyway.

 

You noticed that too?

 

Look who our QB is...and look where our offense is ranked....it certainly takes skill to do that.

 

I mean...you have to REALLY suck to be that bad with a top 5 QB....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense has made just enough plays to keep people saying Shula is decent. This team is in the playoffs in spite of his bullshit, not because of it. If the D doesn't have 9 sacks and 7 points today, the Panthers play next week on the road. The D has bailed this offense out the whole second half of the season and the O better get their heads outta their asses if they want to make a run.

 

Number one scoring D and the offense is bottom third of the whole league.

 

 

Shula could be better but given the way we have operated the last 3 seasons...what do you expect? Seriously? 

 

Head Coach and respectable Coordinator is on the defense. We have drafted nearly all defense. Much of our money is tied up in the defense and the running backs.

 

This is THE ONLY way we can win especially with your best offensive weapon is hurt.

 

We have to win via Defense and Running game.

 

Period. That is where are resources are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year offense is Methodical, but Shula needs to open the passing game like 2011 offense for the playoffs!

 

I agree, but I think that long developing pass plays are hurting us this year. Our WR's are not getting open quick enough and our O-line isn't able to hold of the defensive rush that long. Quicker routes, like slants, 5 yard out routes and quick curls and quick hitter bunch/WR screen routes, like the ones Atlanta used on us today. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula could be better but given the way we have operated the last 3 seasons...what do you expect? Seriously? 

 

Head Coach and respectable Coordinator is on the defense. We have drafted nearly all defense. Much of our money is tied up in the defense and the running backs.

 

This is THE ONLY way we can win especially with your best offensive weapon is hurt.

 

We have to win via Defense and Running game.

 

Period. That is where are resources are.

 

I expect well designed plays built with players strengths in mind, not trying to force a square peg inside a round hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula could be better but given the way we have operated the last 3 seasons...what do you expect? Seriously? 

 

Head Coach and respectable Coordinator is on the defense. We have drafted nearly all defense. Much of our money is tied up in the defense and the running backs.

 

This is THE ONLY way we can win especially with your best offensive weapon is hurt.

 

We have to win via Defense and Running game.

 

Period. That is where are resources are.

 

That's how you win playoff games, we need to tweak the passing game and make this offense more explosive like the 2011 Offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just can't do that, and expect to be bailed out by the NFL's 2013 version of the Bad News Bears. Shula and Rivera need to get their acts together during the next two weeks, or we will be one and done.  Not to mention that we had nine sacks, and only were able to win by a point.  

 

/end rant

 

 

We won! 

 

I must agree.  I was very disappointed in the play calling throughout the game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula is not the best OC, but his play calling has gotten us in the Playoffs for the 1st time since 2008. So you can bash him if you like, I'd but I'll keep him for another year. Don't get me wrong, he does need to improve on his play calling some but more importantly, his play calling at key times. He also needs to draw up quicker developing plays. But of course, better offensive linemen will help next year.

 

We're one of the best teams in the league on 3rd Down Conversions, but some of these conservative play calls may bite us in the big game. We've been very fortunate so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...