Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

As a coach, how do you prepare when you are unsure who your opponent will be?


cardiackat88.

Recommended Posts

Like us, for instance.

There was a possibility of playing the Eagles, 49ers, or Packers. Please correct me of that is erroneous information.

So, as a head coach, how would you prepare your team?

Personally, I think it's time to condition as hard as possible, take your week to get your team into even better shape than they were, or course you would let anyone with any injuries ice up.

Aside from conditioning, I would have film sessions galore. Analyzing with my offense, defense, and special teams specific plays in specific situations, exploiting any weaknesses the three potential teams to play may have. I would analyze the three teams at the same time after studying the three individually. Ie, it's third and short; what's team 1s favorite play to run here? Team 2? Etc.

In short, condition and work hard, plus get to know the ends and outs of all the opponents you may face. This way, you have a head start of being familiar with the team you will be playing.

Obviously being a head coach isn't this easy, but it's something different to discuss, and interesting to see what armchair coach would do.

What would you do as a head coach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't just practicing for a specific opponent.  Many plays you run are going to work on any team so you practice what you do against anyone. Then when you know, you gameplan against an opponent.  We probably are doing more for Green Bay since we have done this already for San Francisco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every team the Panthers had the possibility to play ran a 3-4 defense so they already knew some things.  Otherwise, they didn't focus on any team this week.  They will next week.  It isn't too complicated.  But this whole time, coaches and Gettleman have been working on scouting all 3 opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron Rivera told us in a presser this week. They practiced Wednesday through Saturday. They focused on conditioning and things team have been doing against them. When you get beat by a blitz from one team, you better believe you will see it from another team down the road. So they worked on protections and run fits. Timing in the passing routes. Light practices in terms of hitting but they did work on fitness.

 

The coaching staff and Dave Gettleman's staff split into groups and put together "packages" of every team possible. The players didn't do much film work (on opponents) but the Coaches and scouts did. Ron sent his staff home early most of the week as well. So the game planning starts tonight and they go into a normal work week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news is all three of our possible opponents employ 34 schemes, so you can run vanilla stuff against that just to acclimate to the scheme and adjust your fits.

 

However, scheme doesn't matter if you can't execute your own plays so I think the biggest value is in self scouting. Our run D got pretty soft in the last several weeks- work on that. Cam was throwing high, have him refocus on fundamentals, We have plenty of things we can work on regardless of opponent,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron Rivera told us in a presser this week. They practiced Wednesday through Saturday. They focused on conditioning and things team have been doing against them. When you get beat by a blitz from one team, you better believe you will see it from another team down the road. So they worked on protections and run fits. Timing in the passing routes. Light practices in terms of hitting but they did work on fitness.

 

 

There you go. By playoff time you and every other team knows your weaknesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
×
×
  • Create New...