Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

While Newton struggles against top passing defenses, Kaepernick is worse


panthers55

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/82232/challenges-await-kaepernick-newton

 

 

Kaepernick was tops in the league against NFL defenses in the bottom half of the league (ranked 17-32 in defensive QBR)

 He was 9-0 with 9.1 yards per attempt, 18 TDs versus 0 Ints and a total QBR of 91.  Against top 16 defenses he was 3-4 with 6.2 yards a play, 7 TDs versus 8 Ints and a QBR of 31.

 

Newton was 5th against bottom 16 defenses with a 7-0 record, 8.3 yards per attempt, 16 TDs and 5 Ints with a total QBR of 78.  Against top 16 defenses he had a 5-4 record, 6.3 yards per attempt, 14 TDs versus 8 Ints and a QBR of 39. The biggest difference was Newton's 74 QBR against Seattle versus Kaepernick's 14 and 41 QBR in their 2 games.

 

While it favors Cam the difference isn't that big.  

 

But:

 

More telling is Cam's QBR against teams in the top 16 at home which is 74 versus Kaepernick's QBR against teams in the top 16 on the road which is 33.

 

Cam's record at home against top defenses: 3-1

 

Kaepernick's record on the road against top defenses:  1-2 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can tell just by looking at our offense that Cam is the better QB. Cam makes reads and holds out as long as he can to complete a pass. CK either rolls out or waits until protection breaks down to make plays. Lots of motions and pistol stuff. The whole offense runs on bullsht.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can tell just by looking at our offense that Cam is the better QB. Cam makes reads and holds out as long as he can to complete a pass. CK either rolls out or waits until protection breaks down to make plays. Lots of motions and pistol stuff. The whole offense runs on bullsht.

Oh? The whole offense runs on bullshit? Lol. Still have some Read Options Designs From Last Year.

But I lol, at that, If you think that's just our Offense. WCO and different variations. Even though, Shula shouldve gave Cam some more Runs. Cause it works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you know 48ochoshogun just because you're registered on this forum doesn't mean you have to post the same opinion in every single thread

 

  With what i state, is on par of the OP Post, Can't help the threads have been similar to others threads.

did you just entirely miss the point of this thread?

 

 

yes, yes you did.

 

 

No, Kaep was garbage the first half of the season, everyone knows that. Receivers were just that bad.  He was another man Once Crabs came back, The Offense has been clicking at the right possible time.  I'd say, it's better to have judge him more on a complete basis when Crabs came back and we had let pretty much half or more or less the WR's we had before Crabs came back go.

cam hasn't lost since steve smith came back

 

EAT OUR SHORTS BITCH

DANG, How can i beat that argument, but, Cam isn't on a 7 Game Win Streak eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  With what i state, is on par of the OP Post, Can't help the threads have been similar to others threads.

 

No, Kaep was garbage the first half of the season, everyone knows that. Receivers were just that bad.  He was another man Once Crabs came back, The Offense has been clicking at the right possible time.  I'd say, it's better to have judge him more on a complete basis when Crabs came back and we had let pretty much half or more or less the WR's we had before Crabs came back go.

DANG, How can i beat that argument, but, Cam isn't on a 7 Game Win Streak eh?

 

shut your shit douchebag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...