Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Gameday Final Comparison of Goalline Playcalling


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Deion flat out said our goal to go playcalling was horrible.

 

They said we had 9 plays inside of the 3 yard line and only came away with 3 points total.  Inexcuseable.

 

Why they said it was so mind boggling, and this is what scares me about our staff the most, particularly Rivera and Shula, is that we went down there and tried to out-tough them.  Why is that bad?  Because it shows both stubbornness and a refusal to adjust.  Marshall said we went down there and tried to "power" it in and show them we were tougher.  

 

Then when comparing it to what the Niners did in their goal to go situations, Deion said they showed us respect.  Why?  Because on the final TD they scored they went shotgun, spread us out, and then ran Krapperdick out, essentially making it one on ones across the board and trusting him to beat his matchup.  This is what we should've done with Cam.

 

And this is what made it even worse - Deion pointed out how we weren't even built for the calls we were making.  Why?  Because Cam is our leading rusher at 54 yards and our highest output from a RB was 20-some yards.  Yet, we tried to make a statement and push them back off the line and score.  Smh...

 

Even with all of the talent on San Fran's OL, they didn't try to power through us.  They mixed things up, got us off balance, and then made a call dependent on the situation.  IIRC, without looking, that was the bootleg option/pass to Davis and the. The QB sweep Florence and Keek whiffed on.

 

This just really troubles me about our staff going forward if it remains as-is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what many of us were saying on an earlier thread.  Why we line up against a stout D in an obvious running formation and then try to run basic dive plays again and again makes no sense.  If we show run we should pass and if we really want to run we should spread out the defense and then let Cam run it in like they did with Kap.  Our coaching stupidity, however, forced us to run right into the heart of the strength of their defense.  Why our offense insists on telegraphing play after play baffles and frustrates me so hopefully we get somebody in here next year who knows what the fug they are doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It felt like we were trying to fit a square peg in a round hole every time they tried to force a run on those goal line stands. And as was said by those analyst we kept doing it and refusing to switch up and try something different. It was completely incompetent playcalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This summary is spot on.  We got down on the one yard line and said we either smash it straight ahead and overpower their line, or we give it to them and make them work out of their own endzone with our defense.  Regardless, it absolutely took any guesswork out of it and actually made Vic Fangio's job very easy.  Lowest man wins, and they dug us out every time, totally blew up the line.

 

Really pissing me off now that I'm rehashing in my mind those precious wasted opportunities.  A defense as stout as SF, you get them down to the 1 not once but twice, and don't show a freaking ounce of creativity, at least to make them guess, possibly guessing wrong?

 

Son of a bitch, now I won't sleep tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...