Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do we do this offseason?


MichaelNewtonII

Recommended Posts

What would you do this offseason if you had control?
I for one would sign Aqib Talib and Hakeem Nicks
Draft: Kelvin Benjamin (R1), Loucheiz Purifoy (R2), and either Carlos Hyde or best value T or WR in R3

I would also franchise tag Greg Hardy so I can worry about Cams contract next season before worrying about hardy.

 

If not let Kraken walk and sign Michael Johnson from Cincinatti and save some $

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds good but no way that works under our salary cap. I think we can work out a contract for Hakeem Nicks since he stunk it up this year. He is an upgrade over Lafell

I think we can bring in a few bargain cornerbacks that will be an upgrade over what we have. We definitely need to keep Captain. He is a great tackler and great nickel. He shouldn't be left out on an island. He stinks covering speed guys running go routes.

I don't see us keeping Hardy unfortunately he is just going to cost to much. I think we can get a defensive end for a better price that gives us 80% of what Greg did.

Sign Mitchell and another mid tier safety and perhaps look at replacing Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds good but no way that works under our salary cap. I think we can work out a contract for Hakeem Nicks since he stunk it up this year. He is an upgrade over Lafell

I think we can bring in a few bargain cornerbacks that will be an upgrade over what we have. We definitely need to keep Captain. He is a great tackler and great nickel. He shouldn't be left out on an island. He stinks covering speed guys running go routes.

I don't see us keeping Hardy unfortunately he is just going to cost to much. I think we can get a defensive end for a better price that gives us 80% of what Greg did.

Sign Mitchell and another mid tier safety and perhaps look at replacing Shula.

Yeah i was considering putting we ought to try and sign Michael Johnson from the bengals and let hardy walk… but i didn't want to deal with the backlash i probably would receive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would you do this offseason if you had control?

I for one would sign Aqib Talib and Hakeem Nicks

Draft: Kelvin Benjamin (R1), Loucheiz Purifoy (R2), and either Carlos Hyde or best value T or WR in R3

I would also franchise tag Greg Hardy so I can worry about Cams contract next season before worrying about hardy.

 

 

Several problems with your suggestion......

 

1.  Can't work under the Salary Cap

2.  Completely ignores our OL issues...which is the BIGGEST issue we have on offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...