Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hey even Jeff Davidson went 12-4


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Point is people shouldn't just look at the record as the reason why to keep Shula. Those that actually watched every play this season know play calling was our major weakness.

If we had talent for a power run game.....play calling would look better

any OC would be flawed with this O in reality. Shula's at least played to our D. That let us win games. Crazy Chud ball would have worked against the D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we punted twice the whole game........there's only two weeks i can truely say play-calling was wack this season......shula gets all the blame but never gets credit for jack poo around here.

 

just a quick scenario, we fire shula get a guy everyone wants and we fuggin suck it up the next two seasons because everyone thinks it's the play-calling instead of the sorry ass oline ..........then essential were right back where we started......you don't wanna make a move that could set a franchise back and with firing shula that's a possibility 

 

but i'll be reasonable if we get a o line and receivers and end up sucking then yeah can his ass if he's the main problem, but there's so many factors that play into this that us as fans don't even know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we punted twice the whole game........there's only two weeks i can truely say play-calling was wack this season......shula gets all the blame but never gets credit for jack poo around here.

 

just a quick scenario, we fire shula get a guy everyone wants and we fuggin suck it up the next two seasons because everyone thinks it's the play-calling instead of the sorry ass oline ..........then essential were right back where we started......you don't wanna make a move that could set a franchise back and with firing shula that's a possibility 

 

but i'll be reasonable if we get a o line and receivers and end up sucking then yeah can his ass if he's the main problem, but there's so many factors that play into this that us as fans don't even know about.

I highly doubt we're not going to fix the offensive roster. But to think the problem is all due to the roster is very misguided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we had talent for a power run game.....play calling would look better

any OC would be flawed with this O in reality. Shula's at least played to our D. That let us win games. Crazy Chud ball would have worked against the D.

Shula continually forced runs up the middle instead of being creative by calling more outside plays. Ok, we don't have the personnel to run up the middle. Let's call more plays up the middle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...