Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kraken Compensation


Growl

Recommended Posts

yeah I'm pretty sure it doesnt work this way. i believe the franchise tag only places him under contract for year-as a normal regular player- getting paids the average of top 5 money at his position- and gives the team the freedome to do what they wish for him and trade him for whatever they see fit.

youre thinking of tenders.

 

no that would be the Exclusive tag

 

An "exclusive" franchise player—not free to sign with another club—is offered a minimum of the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of April 16, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no that would be the Exclusive tag

An "exclusive" franchise player—not free to sign with another club—is offered a minimum of the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of April 16, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater.

Which is what I was talking about initially. We aren't going to give him a nonexclusive rights tag because the odds of a team offering us 2 first rounders are immensely low. An exclusive tag permits to deal as we see fit.

If Gettleman's presser implications and our cap situation is to be believed, we would tag him sigh the intent of trading him. A non exclusive tag would scare teams off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that many people have no earthly clue as to what they are talking about in this thread, is hilarious.  YES, if Hardy is tagged under the "Non-exclusive" designation, and chooses to sign with another team, we are compensated with two first round picks.  End. of. story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that many people have no earthly clue as to what they are talking about in this thread, is hilarious.  YES, if Hardy is tagged under the "Non-exclusive" designation, and chooses to sign with another team, we are compensated with two first round picks.  End. of. story.

 

They'd still have to find a team willing to give up 2 1st round picks then, no?

 

Or are the picks similar to compensatory picks? I have always been under the impression that they came from the team that signed him, though.

 

I doubt anyone will give 2 1st rounders for Hardy if that is the case, leaving Carolina to pay around $12 mil for one year just to be right back where they started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'd still have to find a team willing to give up 2 1st round picks then, no?

 

Or are the picks similar to compensatory picks? I have always been under the impression that they came from the team that signed him, though.

 

I doubt anyone will give 2 1st rounders for Hardy if that is the case, leaving Carolina to pay around $12 mil for one year just to be right back where they started.

 

The team would begin negotiations already knowing what they would be giving up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'd still have to find a team willing to give up 2 1st round picks then, no?

Or are the picks similar to compensatory picks? I have always been under the impression that they came from the team that signed him, though.

I doubt anyone will give 2 1st rounders for Hardy if that is the case, leaving Carolina to pay around $12 mil for one year just to be right back where they started.

No team is going to give up two 1sts which is the whole point. If we tagged him with intent to trade, it wouldn't be under the nonexclusive rights tag. That's really all there is to it. We're fully aware he isn't worth that much and we aren't going to get that much, so we'd sign him to an exclusive rights knowing we could deal him for he best offer. I'd say a 2nd is probably the best to hope for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No team is going to give up two 1sts which is the whole point. If we tagged him with intent to trade, it wouldn't be under the nonexclusive rights tag. That's really all there is to it. We're fully aware he isn't worth that much and we aren't going to get that much, so we'd sign him to an exclusive rights knowing we could deal him for he best offer. I'd say a 2nd is probably the best to hope for.

 

Thought that's what I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...