Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SB XLVIII: SEAHAWKS VS BRONCOS

CelibatePimp

By CelibatePimp,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

I'm kinda excited about the game. I hope Manning wins so for today, I'm a broncos fan.

 

Yeah hopefully they win and PM retires on Monday. With Farve long gone and Manning done...Brady will be the only one left of these crybaby QBs who the media shove down our throats. These guys can do no wrong and get constant passes from the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My money is on the Broncos....but I don't feel as strong about it as I did a week ago. I still think there's too much negative energy floating around the Seahawks. 

 

27 Broncos

24 Seahawks 

 

I think the Hawks will implode early lol. Too much adderrall will make their systems unstable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
footballisasport Newbie

footballisasport

Posted
Posted

My money is on the Broncos....but I don't feel as strong about it as I did a week ago. I still think there's too much negative energy floating around the Seahawks. 

 

27 Broncos

24 Seahawks 

 

So the media's psychology is working well. Creating a big deal out of nothing simply to generate a great deal of negative energy for one team over another. 

 

That says to me the Seaharks are the better team but the politics as usual with today's media reign supreme.

 

Don't be surprised if you see some shady calls going against the Seahawks today. A Peyton win must be fulfilled so those in  media can say he has solidify his legacy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So the media's psychology is working well. Creating a big deal out of nothing simply to create a great deal of negative energy for one team over another. 

 

I don't think it has anything to do with the media. I think they are buying into their own hype, the LOB that is. Kinda like us before the 49ers game. I think that will leave them very vulnerable. I may be wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...