Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton: We're not far behind champs re: UDFA gems


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Much was made prior to Sunday's Super Bowl blowout about how smart the Seahawks were in building the team, because they had 19 undrafted players, including five starters. 

Well, the Panthers had 16, or 30.1 percent of their final 53-man roster. Seven -- offensive tackleByron Bell, outside linebacker Chase Blackburn, guard Nate Chandler, defensive tackle Colin Cole, strong safety Quintin Mikell, fullback Mike Tolbert, and cornerback Melvin White -- were starters. 

 

 

 

I get what David Newton is trying to do here, but it doesn't quite work. 

 

Sure we have/had a fair number of "undrafted gems" like the Seattle Seahawks (16 compared to their 19). The thing is (as Newton somewhat breezed over), many of our guys are older, and had already made decent impressions with other teams. But, more importantly, the Seahawks really have found diamonds in the rough, whereas our "discoveries" have been more like...perhaps, rubies.  

 

The biggest question about Seattle's Five starting UDFAs is whether or not they will be able to keep all of them this coming season. Our true UDFAs who got some starting time this year like Melvin White, Mario Addison, Robert Lester, and Nate Chandler still provide big questions as to whether or not they can be longer term answers on the gridiron. 

 

Nice try, Mr. Newton. The comparison is a nice thought that may be valid on the service, but the Panthers have many more questions to answer as to the efficacy of their UDFAs being able to do what the Seahawks did last Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Schneider has had four seasons to pick up UDFAs...

 

Gettleman's first year resulted in Robert Lester, Wes Horton, and Melvin White. Not a bad haul if you ask me. Who knows how many other contributors could be found in three years. Long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Schneider has had four seasons to pick up UDFAs...

 

Gettleman's first year resulted in Robert Lester, Wes Horton, and Melvin White. Not a bad haul if you ask me. Who knows how many other contributors could be found in three years. Long time.

 

Good point. I am not trying to downplay G-man's pick-ups here, I am just saying that many more questions surround our "gems" in reference to their ability to play championship caliber football as opposed to those who have already helped produce a Lombardi for the Seahawks.  We have seen some flashes of good play (amid incompetency), but their ability to consistently help bring that vice-like pressure that the Seahawks produced, particularly in the playoffs, seems like a stretch at this point. But perhaps I am being a bit critical as I am looking from the perspective of a diehard Panthers fan, as opposed to viewing the Seahawks from the outside in (so to speak).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UDFAs are the least of our concerns.  Most of our roster holes right now were mid-round swing and misses by Hurndog. 

 

UDFAs can play a very important part of building a championship team, as the Seahawks' championship/FO just proved. They can be a big a part of the puzzle as anyone, and sometimes cover over potential mid-round whiffs that you referenced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree that we're not FAR behind them, but yeah we didn't get a shutdown corner in White or even a starting caliber safety in Lester (yet). Tolbert, how can he give us credit for that, he had a 1000 yards rushing year in SD before he got here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UDFAs can play a very important part of building a championship team, as the Seahawks' championship/FO just proved. They can be a big a part of the puzzle as anyone, and sometimes cover over potential mid-round whiffs that you referenced.

Agreed . And we have had plenty mid round whiffs to make up for.

Sent from my DROID4 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its technically right, but I have a hard time thinking of guys like Blackburn as undrafted rookies in the context Newton means.

 

I think with the way he means it, guys who maybe aren't necessarily rookies but were undrafted and have maybe bounced around the league on practice squads for 1-2 years...those are the UDFA I *think* he should be referring to. They're most relevant to the "build a team cheaply" philosophy, as these guys are actually diamonds in the rough who can be signed for next to nothing. With a guy like Tolbert, teams know what they're getting and pay according.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...