Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calvin Pryor

ajax4132

By ajax4132,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Show me one person that has in in the 1st? haven't seen him in the second either. He will run around a 4.6 and land in the 3rd round is the idea i've been getting from reading scouting reports and so on. Right now matthews and cooks look to land in the second round range as well so its hard to see him in the same league as those 2.

 

Just saying, you have no clue to where Moncrief will land. Neither do I. Anything could happen.

 

With a good combine, the kid could land in the late 1st and def a possible 2nd rounder. He's everything you want: size, route runner, hands, etc. I hope that you know that the 230lb Moncrief has been clocked running a 4.4 before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted

Riiiiight, keep believing he'll be there in the third round. Now, stop playing GM and Pro Scout. You blow at it.

Go cheerlead else where. I bring you facts and video you give me your opinion which as we all know for nothing. NO ONE has even mentioned him in the first round. Haven't seen him second either so whats your point about me blowing at it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

In defense of this approach: 

 

We are strong at the "QB" positions up the middle--Center (Kalil) calls signals on the OL, QB (Cam) calls stuff for the WRs and RBs, Kuechly calls the front 7 stuff, and....

 

Mitchell was a good player, but was he "that guy?"

 

Godfrey was not.  I personally think Mitchell needs to be a SS and we need a cerebral, hard-hitting FS.   There are a few in this draft who might be nice additions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

Maybe we will draft a quarterback then? I think you guys take the BPA thing a little to far,we don't draft for need within "reason".....

love how extreme.you go to make it look like said something I didn't.

You are a flat out fool, if you truly believe we wouldn't draft safety if one slid to us.

Trying to compare that position to the qb in support of you're weak ass argument, tells me all I meed to know about you on this subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted

love how extreme.you go to make it look like said something I didn't.

You are a flat out fool, if you truly believe we wouldn't draft safety if one slid to us.

Trying to compare that position to the qb in support of you're weak ass argument, tells me all I meed to know about you on this subject.

 

I could care less about you or or your opinions. Fact is you just don't like that we won't be picking a safety sorry. Not the biggest area of need and to my point was to just show you that we don't draft bpa just to draft bpa. It has to be within reason. We drafted luke who was bpa within reason because of the injuries and uncertain play of beason and thomas davis. Don't tell me we go bpa when we draft fua and mcclain back to back and knowing they wern't the best players on the board. It's within reason of need BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ajax4132 Newbie

ajax4132

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just saying, you have no clue to where Moncrief will land. Neither do I. Anything could happen.

 

With a good combine, the kid could land in the late 1st and def a possible 2nd rounder. He's everything you want: size, route runner, hands, etc. I hope that you know that the 230lb Moncrief has been clocked running a 4.4 before.

I see moncrief there too, he is going to kill the combine and at 6'3 225-230 with a 4.4. 

 

I find it difficult for teams (including us to pass him out) 

 

If he isn't there though and Pryor is, Pryor needs to be the pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackofalltrades Rising Star

Jackofalltrades

Posted
Posted

Neither was Seattle's. Let's just face the fact here and realize Cam took a step back for a reason. Our winning nucleus revolves around our offense eating up the clock and our front seven wrecking havoc. If we're a secondary away from becoming the '85 Bears, then I say let's just finish constructing our defense.

Career high completion percentage and low INT's was a step back?

Here I was hoping he would do it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Semaj Newbie

Semaj

Posted
Posted

Neither was Seattle's. Let's just face the fact here and realize Cam took a step back for a reason. Our winning nucleus revolves around our offense eating up the clock and our front seven wrecking havoc. If we're a secondary away from becoming the '85 Bears, then I say let's just finish constructing our defense.

And we lost in the first playoff game. So it was not good enough. I don't believe Cam took a step back. But if he did let's draft a safety to help him. Makes sense.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Sent from my SPH-D710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...