Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess who got 16 reps on the bench press today


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Because it doesn't match what you think, it's automatically stupid, and idiotic?

Many people seem to disagree with you top dawg. So they are all stupid?

 

that's not what he meant.  he meant it would take you 3 days to argue your way out of a paper bag.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is not what I say it is what he does or in this case waht he does not do.Your hands scale is probably different than most.

 he is probably the 20th or lower WR on the board.

 

Put your money where your mouth is then. Friendly bet that there's 19 receivers drafted before Brandon Coleman?

 

Didn't think so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, and kind words. It's cute that people can hold internet grudges for so long.

 

no, you're living in some fantasy..  no one cares enough to hold a grudge.  I was merely pointing out why you may be feeling some resistance in so many different threads.  There is one common factor.  An honest appraisal never killed anyone..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, I think it was a little more than just 2 people here that wanted Tavon Austin, lol.

 

 

And a lot less than "the huddle"

 

Or even close to a majority.

 

I think I like OBJ over Cooks if we are going for a smaller vertical threat WR (38" vert....) but  Austin was a complete reach and Cooks is going to go later where he should(and where Austin should have went).

 

Cooks at 28 is fine, as is OBJ, Matthews, or whoever else Gettleman decides to pick because it's really that close on some of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it doesn't match what you think, it's automatically stupid, and idiotic?

Many people seem to disagree with you top dawg. So they are all stupid?

 

Red, many people agree that you are a troll, make nonsensical arguments, and misconstrue their words in order to go off on tangents and derail threads also. Moreover, since you seem to have a continued confusion about the problem that many people have with you, let me use this thread as an example:

 

You are the one that said people should stop trying to find the next Steve Smith because they like what Brandin Cooks brings to the table. No one else said that but you. Steve Smith had nothing to do with the discussion. You are also the one that called people Marty Hurney for liking what Brandin Cooks brings to the table.  You said that.  It's nonsense.  Hurney is irrelevant and has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion of Brandin Cooks. People looking for the next Steve Smith or trying to be Marty Hurney isn't based on anything germane to Brandin Cooks' viability to be a successful pro receiver, or our 28th pick.  Few, if any, agree with that notion.

 

Now, where people do agree with you is that the Panthers need to draft bigger receivers to try and mitigate Cam's problems with throwing the ball high. Where Steve Smith may come into play as the fact that he is short and Brandin Cooks is short, and that maybe people just don't want two short receivers on the team (or any short receivers on the team after Smitty retires). If you has presented your argument from that perspective, then it would have made sense. Indeed, I have mixed feelings about the matter, as I have alluded to being enamored with size at not only the WR position, but the CB position as well (and I have threads/posts that have said as much).  Where "many people may seem to disagree" with me is that we need to give Brandin Cooks more serious attention, notwithstanding his short stature. I understand that opinion though I disagree with that opinion specifically as it pertains to Brandin Cooks. I even respect the way that some have expressed that opinion. What I don't respect is gratuitous nonsense. I also don't respect putting words in peoples' mouths or attributing stupidity, outlandish notions, or outright lies to my fellow huddlers' rational and respectful opinions that they put forth.

 

In my opinion, you need to stick closer to the issues in your discussion, and stop acting like your opinions based upon the issues (when you decide to stick to them) are any more or less legitimate than anyone else's who has equally (or more) compelling arguments.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...