Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

San Diego St. RB Adam Muema leaves the combine for "religious reasons"


Boltergeist

Recommended Posts

I have no problems with someone being Christian/Atheist/Buddhist/whatever, but why is it not ok for us to shame this lunatic for pretending god is picking his football teams for him?

"God wants me to to spread the word about christianity in foreign countries"... Cool. No prob-lamo with me

"God wants me to play for the Seattle Seahawks" ... Fug off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my guess is God didn't tell him the latest news...pete carroll and company have pretty much crowned christine micheal as seattle's next featured back.

God thinks Micheal has little upside and cant be a feature back in this league. Also said Micheal cant hit that next level as well as others can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even re-known Christian's other than those jokers you see on TV (Joel Osteen, T.D. Jakes, Joyce Meyer etc...) believe in the prosperity gospel (if it's God's will it will happen). 

 

This guy is an idiot and deserves to go undrafted for it.

 

I worked for the Liberty football team for a little bit and someone asked our former recruiting coordinator on what he thought of God having the say in the outcome of a football game... his response "God doesn't give a bloody hell about football" (he was British).

 

Little advice for Adam... "You don't work, you don't eat"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...