Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My first experience on a jury


lightsout

Recommended Posts

Got the summons a few weeks back. Been on since Monday. I guess I still can't give details just yet, as we deliberate tomorrow morning, but I will say this much for now: holy hell is this poo more complicated than I thought it'd be. But, overall, it has been a semi-enjoyable experience. Seeing our system from the inside is interesting. Kinda hope I get called again in a couple of years, and I hope the case is a bit more complex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that was anti-climactic.

Case was rape/child molestation. Evidence was light. Victim's story changed 3 times in 4 days with 3 different witnesses that were put on the stand. Then she recanted back in January. Then she got on the stand and denied it all.

All the ADA had was appeals to emotion and the simple fact that a claim of rape was made. It was only somewhat convincing, but there was plenty of doubt.

We got hung up before lunch at 10-2. Eventually, I talked a woman into reason, got us to 11-1. Then the foreman, who is a deacon at his church (and led us in prayer prior to the start of deliberation....that was awkward for me), kept strong to his guilty verdict. The rest of us (all who think something might have happened, but weren't convinced with the evidence) weren't budging on our not guilty verdict.

After lunch, we were told the two sides reached an agreement. He took a plea agreement for a lesser charge (he faced 6 charges) of indecent liberties. 3 year probation, 30 years national sex offender registration.

Kinda bummed we didn't get to duke it out more in the deliberation room. Can't wait for 2 years to pass so I can do it again. Good time, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trial i sat on was for first degree murder :(

 

I was on duty when they had a massive child molestation case that included several hours of videotape. 

 

I wanted no part of that trial (and thankfully, wasn't picked).

We had 1 hour of tape to watch from one interview with a child therapist who worked in conjunction with the investigation. That was painful.

Most of us were able to keep the emotion out of it. Others just couldn't do it (which is understandable, but not ideal for a jury in any case, let alone child molestation).

ADA's most convincing sentence of the trial was in her closing. She said "what 13 year old girl knows that a penis is hard and dry, and then wet after ejaculation? What 13 year old girl knows that semen is salty and white?"

All I could think was "you DO realize we're in an era of the internet, right?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had 1 hour of tape to watch from one interview with a child therapist who worked in conjunction with the investigation. That was painful.

Most of us were able to keep the emotion out of it. Others just couldn't do it (which is understandable, but not ideal for a jury in any case, let alone child molestation).

ADA's most convincing sentence of the trial was in her closing. She said "what 13 year old girl knows that a penis is hard and dry, and then wet after ejaculation? What 13 year old girl knows that semen is salty and white?"

All I could think was "you DO realize we're in an era of the internet, right?"

 

Video in this case was of the actual crimes.

 

The perpetrators were an elderly couple.  The victims, teenage boys.

 

Word was that a state trooper threw up while examining the evidence.

 

I don't wanna watch something that could make a state trooper throw up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video in this case was of the actual crimes.

 

The perpetrators were an elderly couple.  The victims, teenage boys.

 

Word was that a state trooper threw up while examining the evidence.

 

I don't wanna watch something that could make a state trooper throw up.

Holy poo.....yeahhhhhhhhh fug that. I would not have been able to stomach that. My god...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...