Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So what's the plan?


CollegePanther

Recommended Posts

Everyone was getting mad at me the past few days for questioning Gettleman's "plan". Well now with most of the top FAs gone and 8-9 empty starting spots, I would like to hear what you Gettlenuthuggers see as his plan. So please, tell me what we could possibly do to have a competitive team this season. I need some optimism. Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to hear such from Mage and Jangler, who ridiculed people for bashing Gettleman on the Smith trade. Nicks would have been nice, if we still had Smith, but last year he barely did better than a 35 year old.  Still, we were relying on a #2 to be our #1 and I couldn't have more displeasure.

 

So spin this hit Mage and Jangler?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fair. If we're all going to squeal "Gettlemagic" when he does something positive then his poor decisions can also be questioned. Gettleman's plan for the offseason is looking mighty poor and we better hope we get lucky enough in the draft and with free agent scraps for a second consecutive years if we want to be competitive this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plan is to sign some band aid one year rentals.

Now isn't the time. After the draft we will know what are real rental holes are....

Then as the season approaches teams will cut all kinds of vet players. Boom goes the dynamite and Gettlemen gets his 1 yr rentals.

His plan doesn't involve overpaying for this wave of FAs. The cheap vets rejected right as the season start is his plan. Build in the draft.....rent the holes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...