Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blue chip players


Verge

Recommended Posts

Another reason to not be worried is amount of "Blue Chip" players we have on our roster, blue chip of course meaning, someone who can be argued top 10 in their position within reason, or at least, that is general argument.

 

We have a whopping seven blue chip players, SEVEN. Just for some perspective.

 

Atlanta: 2

New Orleans: 5

Tampa: 3

Denver: 9

Seattle: 8

New England: 4

San Francisco: 8

Packers: 5

 

It is going to be alright, we have a diverse core, CALM DOWN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No verge no! Our core guys of captain and Mitchell and ginn walked away! We won't win a single game now! Bring me gettlemans head!! Arhhhhhhhhhhhhh I'm irrational and emotional with no foresight whatsoever

 

I probably could of argued Mitchell, honestly. I could throw Wharton in our blue chip players if I reaaallly wanted to. This is getting silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably could of argued Mitchell, honestly. I could throw Wharton in our blue chip players if I reaaallly wanted to. This is getting silly.

Mitchell and Wharton were very serviceable players but honestly if we sign Ryan Clark I doubt we see any drop in production perhaps a raise in production. Mitchell was a nobody who excelled in our system. But yes this is getting terribly silly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers arguable 'blue chip' guys by going the top 10 at position: Cam, Luke, Kalil, Hardy, TD...fringe top 10 guys include CJ, Star, Olsen, and Tolbert. 

 

We have as strong a core as anyone but outside of those 9 we are hurting pretty bad compared to those other teams you listed. The bottom of our 53 man roster has to be amongst the worst in the league after being quite solid last season. 

 

After those 9, who else is really worth writing home about? Short was solid and can definitely be a great player in this league. Amini Silatolu can be great if he reaches his ceiling and gets healthy. Klein was solid in limited time for a rookie. Gano is a beast and Nortman played well for sure. The rest are JAGS and meh. We are really hurting from Hurney's traded picks...those second and first round picks hurt our roster and depth pretty severely I'd be willing to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has anybody actually said anything of that sort? (if they did, I missed it) I get why some folks rely on stats. I don't, and honestly I'm not sure why people keep trying to convince me I should. (it ain't gonna happen) 😕 Consistency is my big thing too, and the lack of it is why I want to move on from Bryce. But again, that's an argument I make without denying that he can indeed play in (and yes, win) NFL games. Hating bad QB play is fine. Denying when you see good QB play is silly. Let's be real for a second... This may not be you specifically, but there are some folks for whom Bryce can do absolutely nothing to win their approval. Some are always gonna want a bigger / stronger / faster / more athletic (in some cases, Newtonesque) quarterback even if Bryce does start to play consistently. At that point, they'll just shift the argument from "we can't win with Bryce" to "well, we can't keep winning with Bryce" 😖 You know all this as well as I do. So again, I want to move on from Bryce as well. I'd happily (hell, merrily) keep him as a backup, but I doubt there's a realistic path to that happening. But no matter what, I'm gonna keep my debate points based in reality, and I'm not gonna be responsive to "he just sucks" level persuasion. Is any of that unreasonable? 🤔
    • Apples and oranges.   No one is coming for Jon Snow and the neutral party when they compliment Bruce when it is just normal talk about a game.  Which is the literal picture you are trying to paint above.  I mean that’s exactly what you argued. if you start a thread that is about the future of the franchise at QB going forward at QB and what we should do or are thinking! Yeah, the anti Bryce crowd is going to very vocal on that thread because the literal topic is extending Bryce and the future at QB (which is what an anti Bryce position is literally about.  Moving on.  The future) This thread? I literally called out people in their feelings wanting to make this about Bryce and their hurt feelings eroding over.  You can find where I literally calls them out go make another Bryce thread if they didn’t want to talk Saints and the most relevant thing about them.  And the thread went exactly as we all knew it would.   Bryce deserved player of the week talk for Atlanta.  I have always acknowledged his great games.  A shame there are only two 
    • Then the offense will be the same up and down underperforming offense they are this year and our FO are filled with idiots.
×
×
  • Create New...