Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What shotgun should I buy?

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok, I decided on 4... which is the best?

 

1) Mossberg 50411 500SP 12 18 CB 6SH SYN PGK

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/46276

 

2) Mossberg 50577 500SP 12 20 CB 8SH SYN

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/47809

 

3) Remington 870 Express 12g 18" blued, black-synthetic

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/95077

 

4) REM 870 EXP 12/18 7RD MBLK TACT CHK

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/411550764

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMorgan Newbie

BMorgan

Posted
Posted

We had a Webley & Scott Tactical .12 gauge in one of our raffles last weekend. Not a bad looking gun for around $500.00.

I have thought about a getting a Mossberg Mariner (the 500 in Nickel) several times over the years, but just haven't done it.

The Remington is tried and true.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

I prefer the tactical model for home defense simply because the wife feels more comfortable shooting from the waist or hip. The Benelli pistol grip is removable and it becomes a standard stock. I also prefer the tactical models because most of them also make a little shorter barrel, which is very good for inside the home.

 

The Navy was using full size Remingtons for a long time on ships and they were a bitch going through hatches and narrow opening. The submarines had it right all along when they began using tactical style shotguns in their much tighter quarters. The surface Navy didn't get there for another 10 years.

 

The Navy now uses the Benelli M4 Super 90 12ga JSCS (Joint Service Combat Shotgun)

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LUUUUUKE Rookie

LUUUUUKE

Posted
Posted

Any recommendation? I was thinking Remington 870 Express. I almost bought it last weekend but decided to consult huddle first.

http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/shotguns/model-887/model-887-nitro-mag-tactical.aspx

https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/mobile/product/62447/remington_887_nitromag_tac_12_185_blk

I have one, and it's amazing! I recommend you utilizing YouTube to watch some videos. You will not regret this purchase. Shoots 2 3/4, 3, and 3 1/2 inch shells interchangeably.

The end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...