Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would A running focus team be a bad thing?


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

I agree but you build balance first by having a strong line. If the offensive line is dominated on run and pass blocking Megaton and AP wouldn't do us any good.

I think the line this year will be better than last as long as we don't have a ton of injuries.  We did fairly well considering we had a turnstile at the guard position last year..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the line this year will be better than last as long as we don't have a ton of injuries. We did fairly well considering we had a turnstile at the guard position last year..

I hope so because I would prefer going wide receiver/tight end in the first then BPA for wide receiver or tackle in the second and third round.

The offensive line in this draft is a little thin in my opinion though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope so because I would prefer going wide receiver/tight end in the first then BPA for wide receiver or tackle in the second and third round.

The offensive line in this draft is a little thin in my opinion though.

I think we will find a few LTs in free agency.  Once teams draft their LT in the first for example there will a desire to cut vets at that position and we should be able to pick them up for a decent price.  Most draft analyses say that you can find a starting tackle in the first 3 rounds this year.  There are not a tons of guys that is true but we only need 1 of them.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2014/OT

http://www.drafttek.com/2014-NFL-Draft-Prospect-Rankings/Top-College-Left-Offensive-Tackles-2014-Draft.asp

 

 

I looked at guys like Mayock but he only lists the top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton only accounted for 550 yds of rushing out of 2,000yds

When your QB has over 25% of your yards on the ground, it's not the best thing. But, what he was saying is that there a times when a play breaks down and cam runs making it look, on the stat sheet, as though it was a well-designed play. In actuality, cam is running for his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your QB has over 25% of your yards on the ground, it's not the best thing. But, what he was saying is that there a times when a play breaks down and cam runs making it look, on the stat sheet, as though it was a well-designed play. In actuality, cam is running for his life.

At least he can elude defenders and run well.  Other guys are like statues. The issue is how many of his yards are scrambles and how many are designed plays for him to run.   From what I saw, there are fewer designed plays than in the past.  Of course sometimes he will actually audibelize to himself and run even when that play wasn't called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way i see it is that most of the teams in the NFL are starting to...well.. already have started mainly worrying about the pass threat.   And are structuring their defense as such.  isnt it Tampa that said they are running 3-4 this year?    So lets assume we have D-will and stewart healthy, and they CAN pound the ball,  with two backs doesnt that put us in a position to exploit a flaw in a defense designed soley around the pass.  I mean yeah, on occasion you need to throw, but if we can just find someone to run a decent route and open up things for olsen, I think were golden.   The key is that stewart gets healthy..  playing a team in the 3-4  with two backs like we have is pretty much and automatic 3-4 yard gain every time IMO  I dont think G-Man will ignore OL and WR in the draft so we will def have bodies on the field that can catch.

 

With our offensive line, YES...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, you got it. Watch us rely on Cam's legs again since Shula can't fix our blocking scheme.

Need talent. We didn't have the OL or RB talent last year for a power run scheme.

Williams was the healthy RB and he isn't a power runner at 30 nor when he was younger.

OL was weak.

You can't just say well if a coach was good then they would be running well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...