Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would A running focus team be a bad thing?


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

I agree but you build balance first by having a strong line. If the offensive line is dominated on run and pass blocking Megaton and AP wouldn't do us any good.

I think the line this year will be better than last as long as we don't have a ton of injuries.  We did fairly well considering we had a turnstile at the guard position last year..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the line this year will be better than last as long as we don't have a ton of injuries. We did fairly well considering we had a turnstile at the guard position last year..

I hope so because I would prefer going wide receiver/tight end in the first then BPA for wide receiver or tackle in the second and third round.

The offensive line in this draft is a little thin in my opinion though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope so because I would prefer going wide receiver/tight end in the first then BPA for wide receiver or tackle in the second and third round.

The offensive line in this draft is a little thin in my opinion though.

I think we will find a few LTs in free agency.  Once teams draft their LT in the first for example there will a desire to cut vets at that position and we should be able to pick them up for a decent price.  Most draft analyses say that you can find a starting tackle in the first 3 rounds this year.  There are not a tons of guys that is true but we only need 1 of them.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2014/OT

http://www.drafttek.com/2014-NFL-Draft-Prospect-Rankings/Top-College-Left-Offensive-Tackles-2014-Draft.asp

 

 

I looked at guys like Mayock but he only lists the top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton only accounted for 550 yds of rushing out of 2,000yds

When your QB has over 25% of your yards on the ground, it's not the best thing. But, what he was saying is that there a times when a play breaks down and cam runs making it look, on the stat sheet, as though it was a well-designed play. In actuality, cam is running for his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your QB has over 25% of your yards on the ground, it's not the best thing. But, what he was saying is that there a times when a play breaks down and cam runs making it look, on the stat sheet, as though it was a well-designed play. In actuality, cam is running for his life.

At least he can elude defenders and run well.  Other guys are like statues. The issue is how many of his yards are scrambles and how many are designed plays for him to run.   From what I saw, there are fewer designed plays than in the past.  Of course sometimes he will actually audibelize to himself and run even when that play wasn't called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way i see it is that most of the teams in the NFL are starting to...well.. already have started mainly worrying about the pass threat.   And are structuring their defense as such.  isnt it Tampa that said they are running 3-4 this year?    So lets assume we have D-will and stewart healthy, and they CAN pound the ball,  with two backs doesnt that put us in a position to exploit a flaw in a defense designed soley around the pass.  I mean yeah, on occasion you need to throw, but if we can just find someone to run a decent route and open up things for olsen, I think were golden.   The key is that stewart gets healthy..  playing a team in the 3-4  with two backs like we have is pretty much and automatic 3-4 yard gain every time IMO  I dont think G-Man will ignore OL and WR in the draft so we will def have bodies on the field that can catch.

 

With our offensive line, YES...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, you got it. Watch us rely on Cam's legs again since Shula can't fix our blocking scheme.

Need talent. We didn't have the OL or RB talent last year for a power run scheme.

Williams was the healthy RB and he isn't a power runner at 30 nor when he was younger.

OL was weak.

You can't just say well if a coach was good then they would be running well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...