Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kenny Britt visiting Carolina


solorca

Recommended Posts

Panthers feel he is not a #1 and that is their only real need at WR right now.

Well they don't seem to be interested in DJax either so... where do they plan to find one?

It seems awful presumptuous to assume that we can just find a kid in the draft that is already number 1 caliber. AJ Greens don't come around often, and when they do they don't last until pick 28. And you shouldn't put all your eggs into the finding a Keenan Allen basket, who was like the 8th receiver taken.

That's not even covering the assumption that Cotchery will be a two for us (not a huge stretch, but not a given either) and that Pilares, McNutt, King, Underwood, or Webb can be a three when frankly at this point they're barely rosterable as receivers.

Don't get me wrong, I like the Cotchery and Underwood signings, I just don't like them so much that we stop looking elsewhere. Hopefully we have something else up our sleeve, but I'm unsure we do anything else until the draft.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...maaaaan, korea is playing with missiles, russia is posturing, a whole plane is missing somewhere, and Wichita State just took an L...i promise the whole world isnt losing sleep over your decision. 

 

smh...shoulda never gave you (..) money...

We have a pretty long thread dedicated to where he might end up.

 

The third person reference is a little annoying though.  At least he left a smiley.  : )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's anyone I trust to get a weapon for Cam, it's G-Man. Say what you will about the Nicks controversy, but it revealed that Hakeem didn't want to be 'the guy'. That is LaFell-ish. I trust Dave's analysis.

This draft is deep at WR on top of it all.

 

It's true.  It's not like Eli didn't have weapons while GMAN was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's anyone I trust to get a weapon for Cam, it's G-Man. Say what you will about the Nicks controversy, but it revealed that Hakeem didn't want to be 'the guy'. That is LaFell-ish. I trust Dave's analysis.

This draft is deep at WR on top of it all.

 

that and the scouting department that he was a part of in new york went around shaking trees and servicable receivers would fall out.

 

people can say what they want about his ego or how he handled the smith situation but i don't doubt his talent evaluation abilities in the slightest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...