Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Outside perspective on our offseason


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2014/03/22/carolina-panthers-having-trying-offseason/FtEGHoy6pbjyle4bPYXiwM/story.html

Short piece from the Boston Globe that I think is very accurate. The writer doesn't have any of the emotional attachments many of us carry and is able to view the situation in a pure football sense.

Second-year general manager Dave Gettleman, a Dorchester native and longtime scout with the Bills and Giants, has taken heat after making unpopular decisions this offseason. But upon closer examination, there’s solid football and economic reasoning behind most of Gettleman’s moves, and there’s still plenty of reason for optimism in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is some nice journalism.

 

Understanding the beauty of what Gettlemen is doing takes a mature, complex, holistic look at everything we know he has to consider and an understanding that there are things we do not know.  It really pissed me off when people were bashing him because it was stupid on all levels. Yes, even those who support Gettlemen were disappointed and frustrated, but we knew that Gettlemen has not been creating problems, he has been fixing them.  We also knew that Gettlemen has an eye for talent and did some pretty impressive bottom fishing last year.  How do you complain about 12-4 on a budget?  They found a way.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've known this all along, and I'm hoping that in the end, we're younger and better for it. I did not like the letting go of Mitchell, and I loathed the way the Smitty situation was handled.

If you actually paid attention this off season, every team cut older players due to monstrous contracts. The entire League did it, not just a few teams. Want to know why? This is a copycat league and the Seahawks just won the SB and shut down the most productive offense in the history of the league with relatively no name players. What's more, they're like the second youngest team in the NFL behind only the Rams I believe. Sure they have some "big names" now, but Sherman was drafted in the 6th rnd I believe.

Bottom line is, we all need to show some patience throughout this process. Losing Smitty the way we did is why everyone was so rabid, and rightfully so. We just need to regain some perspective. That's hard to do though, especially when you read an article that refers to the Ravens' WR Steve Smith. Maybe I need anger management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is some nice journalism.

 

Understanding the beauty of what Gettlemen is doing takes a mature, complex, holistic look at everything we know he has to consider and an understanding that there are things we do not know.  It really pissed me off when people were bashing him because it was stupid on all levels. Yes, even those who support Gettlemen were disappointed and frustrated, but we knew that Gettlemen has not been creating problems, he has been fixing them.  We also knew that Gettlemen has an eye for talent and did some pretty impressive bottom fishing last year.  How do you complain about 12-4 on a budget?  They found a way.

 

The only problem I've had at all with what Gettleman has done is the way in which he cut Smitty. I guess you can call it learning through the experiences, and he needs more time, etc. But he did not handle that the right way at all. And also, if Hardy plays on the tag this year and doesn't get 20+ sacks, I'd be pissed. We need to lock him up long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I don't see how the article accurately reflects or even really addresses what made this off-season so "trying", which was really the release of Smitty (which I think that most would agree now really wasn't an economic move, or at least that's what the FO said).  The fan base was really "good" until that happened.  

 

Of course there are fans who believe that tagging Hardy was not the right move, but I feel that most of us would have supported Dave Gettleman either way in reference to tagging Hardy.  Tagging Hardy didn't cause the firestorm in the fan base, and that's what the article is indirectly really speaking to.  But most fans already knew that it was going to be fiscally difficult this off-season (as it will next off-season, perhaps even more so). G-man had a great amount of equity and goodwill due to the 12-4 record last season. Though he abruptly ended the "honeymoon" with the fans by mishandling the Smitty situation, the proof of the pudding of his success is going to be what happens during the season.

 

To me the article is kind of like preaching to the choir at this point.  I just see the article as nothing special, if not a little vanilla. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

 

To me the article is kind of like preaching to the choir at this point.  I just see the article as nothing special, if not a little vanilla. 

 

I agree to an extent.  It definitely doesn't read as "unbiased" but I agree with most if not all of the points in the article.  But its all things that we've all been discussing for a few days if not weeks by now.

 

Hardy was viewed as one of the key players.  He very well may have been our best player down the stretch arguably.  We wanted to keep the front of the defense intact.

 

The backlash towards the FO stems from how much of a weakness our offense was last year imo.  Fans remember how much we struggled in this department over the last two years.  Now we are seemingly getting weaker.  But I argue we need a youth movement as well as we need to address the Cam contract.  We are doing what we have to do.  Which most of us have known for sometime now.  Thus I read the article with the feeling these points are being rehashed to get some boston globe readers to back a boston guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...