Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Up For MIKE EVANS?

carolina-chuck

By carolina-chuck,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Was going to make this thread earlier but was hoping someone would. Since no one did, I will.

Curtis Conway (NFL Network) thinks so.

Imo, Evans is soley the best WR in this draft! With the additions of Dickson and DeCoud, I would invest the future on this kid with no hesitation. Evans would easily help this team for another NFCS title run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I say no way we move up to get a WR. Again for the thousandth time. this draft is too deep at WR to give up something for one. We could wait til rd 3 to start looking at WR's and still get a couple good ones.

Sure its a deep class of wr, but none of them is comparable to MIKE EVANS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

Very unlikely we trade up at all. I would be pretty surprised, I don't expect Gettleman to mortgage the future. It's too deep a draft.

 

 

I agree it makes no damn sense and I wish people would drop it honestly.

 

Evans isn't worth it, no one is. We need all of our picks and our staff has picked pretty well so far so I want to see what a real GM can do with his full arsenal of picks since last year he only had 5 to work with and hit good on 3 of them.(the other 2 are still  a ? )

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Contributor

teeray

Posted
Posted

Normally I am 100% against moving up in the draft, plus it has bit us before.

 

But with us being in such cap hell, we could probably save a couple bucks by trading away some picks to move up.  This might be the year to do it.

 

As long as we aren't giving up so much we mortgage our future.  I wouldn't do an Atlanta for what's his face trade for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

....The dude isn't even the consensus top receiver in the draft. Most put Sammy Watkins as better.

Wow, consensus? Seriously?

Evans is a STUD! Watkins can be great but is still RAW. Evans is a plug and play WR. Looked phenomenal at the combine and pro days. Study the player and quit reading stuffs. Evans made Manziel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moonraker
      Canales is holding us back

      By Moonraker · Posted

      I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • GoobyPls
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By GoobyPls · Posted

      I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • hepcat
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By hepcat · Posted

      While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...