Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

According to PFT Panthers have interest in Sidney Rice


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

BPA suggests that the Panthers will be true to their board and not reach for a position.  But do not think that need is not a factor in structuring the board. Look at the players they have brought in for visits.  WR, OL, DE (soon to be a need?) DBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He cleared out with Dr Andrews, so he's healthy. Rice is still only 27 and is a legit talent at WR. He could become a Pro Bowler with Cam slinging him the ball.

Wouldn't hurt.

 

I agree.  Adding him to the WRs that will battle for a spot won't hurt.   I believe signing him will not change our strategy in the draft.  We'll go OT or WR in the first.  Depending on who is a better pick at 28.  

 

On OT or a WR is gonna fall.   Happens every year.  We'll land a talent at 28. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh? Instead of mentioning the recently jettisoned Panther receivers "poor catch radius", they instead mention "Cam Newton's somewhat erratic ball placement".  Go figure!   :cool:

 

As far as Rice, Gettleman, and the Panthers?.....We'll see (however, I don't think the Panthers will pick him up, unless it's at the most dirt cheap price)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh? Instead of mentioning the recently jettisoned Panther receivers "poor catch radius", they instead mention "Cam Newton's somewhat erratic ball placement".

Go figure! :cool:

Yep, they hated Micheal Jordan too before he won 6 rings. Enjoy the ride, ignore the haters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sidney Rice | FA

(April 15, 2014 11:41 AM EDT)

ESPN Panthers reporter David Newton considers free agent Sidney Rice a "long shot" to sign in Carolina.

Rice would be a good fit with the Panthers and shouldn't be expensive, but Carolina has next to no money to spend and doesn't have a lot of ways to create more cap space. The Seahawks have over $15 million in cap room and would be our guess for Rice's landing spot on an incentive-based, one-year deal.

SOURCE: ESPN.COM

David Newton doesn't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...