DeAngelo Beason

I hope they keep it.

Which makes it that much more offensive.

I don't see Teddy starting more than 4 games before the install a 1st round rookie as the starter, unless Teddy somehow figures out how to be a good QB.

I'm just sick of the Bills poaching us non-fugging-stop. Damn. Do your own thing. If there was a dude out there that was dating every single one of my ex's I'd start taking that sh*t as an offense.

Dude. Give me a fugging breeeeaaak!

ESPN didn't make any specific claims. They just put the complaints on display in one centralized source.

ESPN finally put up a decent article that summarizes the complaints against Watson. After reviewing them I'm changing my tone and saying I 100% do NOT want him... and I've supported us selling the farm for him previously. There is enough similar detail between each of the accounts to make the complaints seem quite believable.

I still cannot fathom why anyone thinks Trey Lance is a top 10 pick.

If any accusations are proven true, no. As things stand now, my answer is still yes.

Settle for another decade of medocrity.

What if that player IS the future, and is one of the premier future players of the entire league?

He's just worth it. That's all there is to it. Opportunities like this just don't come up. There aren't any times in league history that I can think of where a franchise player of this caliber came available right as he was reaching his prime.

I'm not dignifying this with a response.

I am pretty confident this isn't going to happen.

I'd give the edge to Cam. Cam really set a new baseline for all subsequent top picks because of how he performed in his rookie season. It was unthought of that a rookie could pass for 4k yards... and that is completely disregarding the absurd 14 rushing touchdowns he put up. Melo is leading the Hornets to the playoffs, but I don't necessarily think he is resetting the standard for how top rookies should be expected to perform moving forward like Cam did.

Come back home big dawg

Once again, depth signing people. This is not a bank breaking move. They're creating depth and competition on the OL - one of the position groups where this team was terrible last year.

People are acting like this is big money. He's essentially cheap depth. Tackles are expensive. Even backups.

While I agree, this defense was already really, really, really bad last year. There aren't really many guys out there that could replace him and be an upgrade.

Paired up with a young offensive mind and innovator like Joe Brady... maybe. I wouldn't give up much for him though.

I agree. There's not enough tape to spend a top 10 pick on the guy. I'd stand by that statement even if he ends up being a pro bowler.

If you actually read what Jake said, he didn't necessarily endorse the guy. He more or less said "I've been there"

Not necessarily endorsing Jones, but I do agree that mobility is overrated. It's a band-aid that masks other glaring issues.

I don't think he would be costly at all.

Why would we not be able to afford it?