trucpfan

Lol based off what? Or that’s just a feeling you have? Based off Chris Simms qb evaluation over the last four years he’s been very accurate with his assessments. It SEEMS like Corral has the tools to be a excellent starter will our coaching staff actually coach him up to his potential is my question.

Lol I had to laugh myself, he’s as pro ready as Pickett will he pickup the playbook quickly and get that aspect down packed is the only thing holding him back. Start PJ we traded up and considered him our qb 1 for a reason.

Foles ran a rpo system to perfection dam near he’s had the skill set he has the knowledge if we can split Sams money with someone anyone in a trade (highly unlikely) I’d do it in a heartbeat. He’s a better starter hands down until Matt’s ready to be thrown to the wolves.

Do you attribute those stats to our poor o-line and Sam bad qb play? What are his cap hit numbers this year? That’ll help put it in perspective average of the two and he’s way more valuable then a 4th-5th or any comp pick possible. A young qb needs as many weapons as possible to try to be successful early on.

That maturity seemed to be what they leaned on seems like a bonus going into a professional job, especially nfl quarterback. Adversity makes you tougher let’s see how it plays out.

That was bad it gave outsiders a good glimpse into Matt’s NFL mindset which as of now is very questionable. If you think a second team all pro LT is better slated at guard you sir are Lost. For you to stick to that assessment after the whole dam season shows lack of evaluation or lack of mental adjustments because you’d have to adjust your evaluations to what the nfl says is elite. And that’s first or second team all pros and even a pro bowl players.

I wonder what’s the 100k that’s not guaranteed.

Oh that’s huge if we did hopefully they can agree on terms, whatever it takes to get Chinn back to playing close to los. Where he was basically DROTY makes so much sense.

Yea that’s crazy #2 with 19 dam trades that’s a better evaluation based the amount of successful trades. I feel like this as well, let’s trade down and target someone like Penning who may be the equivalent of any of the top three. Because we have to add some draft capital and a Qb it seems. I’m ok with a Coral or Howell in the second I’d rather a young non broken inexperienced QB then what we know doesn’t work.

Not a big deal he’ll get charged reduced down to the bare minimum and this will be a non factor.

My only question to both of you what if we can’t trade back it’s not that easy in that small window to get a offer you like etc. my question what do we do if we don’t have that trade back option Willis and both top LT’s are gone. The top CB or DE good enough?

Oh I completely understand that’s Rhule for you BC was totally outplaying Erving late in the season and I’m pretty sure during the film session he was doing this same sht. Because the next week we went right back to Erving. It seems like we’re locked on KP. They just showed a clip on espn with Rhule showing a little love chatting it up with Willis.

Yea it’s looking bad for Baker, he’s not terrible but I’m leaning towards a rookie gives us the chance to try (repeat try) to mold and develop him to be what we want from him. We definitely already know what Baker can and can’t do. As well as we’ve seen what trying to take a recompilation project gets you why follow last years bad decision. Let’s see if we can get one of the two top qbs if we don’t go line and get the most out of him put the talent around him and shoot for a second year Super Bowl like good teams with a good second year qb tend to do.

Why aren’t gloves allowed?

Man this forum is hilarious, Natt definitely takes his job serious.

I’d be ecstatic if we could accomplish that with intentions of upgrading key positions going into the next season. We’d be like the rams a team with a ton of talent just needing a few more stars to push us over the top. Or even the Bucs before Brady stout D good wr and then they added a top Qb top notch TE few more d players presto super bowl.

Hell naw, to the naw naw naw we dont need a qb with deep ball issues we need a deep ball thrower to maximize our highly productive number one wr. Even our number two excels with a deep ball thrower so he has to be scratched off the list.

I was about to say this but…. My guy summed it up respectfully as we say. Like damn can we become better without complaining, 22 positions to address we’re solidifying so many positions that our team becomes a very desirable destination for anyone looking for that Rams type of team. Insert top qb and compete for it all.

Really good sports reporter RIH

Literally best off season in my football fandom life to see them get done so dirty just brings joy to my day

He probably wants a little more then we’re willing to pay being we’ve been getting very team friendly type deals. Pay the man and move money around in a year or two like NO does.

Doc I don’t know about that Josh was a similar project and now they have a top elite tier qb for let’s say 7-10 years and they traded up from 12 to 7 to do so giving up more then we would. Looking back honestly you’d have to say it was easily worth it. You have to be able to develop them into what you expect a top tier performer but once you do bingo set at the most important position on the team.

Macado yes he’s on charge of the offense I’m trust him based on his experiences coaching the way he rated the Mahomes class along with Jallen. He’s going for development of Willis I’d think and the main thing we need is a solid Oline with Armstead we’d say we have that.

Deonte Brown

You can’t guarantee this man entire contract just barely escaping a legal fiasco we did exactly what we should have done. We’re good the browns aren’t winning a thing.