Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blitz Packages to be seen?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

We all know that Meeks is very anti-blitz... the philosophy of his defensive scheme is to get pressure with the front four alone, let the LB's and DB's drop back into coverage, blah blah blah.

With Kemo gone, while we may be able to substitute guys and still get pressure, it's hard to replace his massive body. To get additional pressure, are we more likely to see zone blitzing schemes? It'd be a modification of Meeks' overall defensive philosophy, but it may be necessary given the injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that Meeks is very anti-blitz... the philosophy of his defensive scheme is to get pressure with the front four alone, let the LB's and DB's drop back into coverage, blah blah blah.

With Kemo gone, while we may be able to substitute guys and still get pressure, it's hard to replace his massive body. To get additional pressure, are we more likely to see zone blitzing schemes? It'd be a modification of Meeks' overall defensive philosophy, but it may be necessary given the injury.

Actually having smaller and more athletic DT's in (in replace of Kemo) would most likely add to our ability to get pressure on the QB. Kemo was a space eater and got no push inside.

This injury prob will end up helping the Pass D, while hurting the Run D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that Meeks is very anti-blitz... the philosophy of his defensive scheme is to get pressure with the front four alone, let the LB's and DB's drop back into coverage, blah blah blah.

With Kemo gone, while we may be able to substitute guys and still get pressure, it's hard to replace his massive body. To get additional pressure, are we more likely to see zone blitzing schemes? It'd be a modification of Meeks' overall defensive philosophy, but it may be necessary given the injury.

Kemo didn't generate any pressure so whoever replaces him won't likely generate less pressure necessitating more blitzing. We will most likely be getting more pressure at the expense of perhaps run stopping. As for zone blitzing schemes, that is still a blitz which you said meeks is against. What you should look for instead is more creative line play with more stunts and twists and other tactics to get pressure on the quarterback. You may give up some run fit gap integrity when you run a stunt for example but it also confuses the offensive blocking assignments as well. It comes down to your strong safety and linebaclers to fill the gaps and for players to try and maintain their gap assignments as much as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

Kemo didn't generate any pressure so whoever replaces him won't likely generate less pressure necessitating more blitzing. We will most likely be getting more pressure at the expense of perhaps run stopping. As for zone blitzing schemes, that is still a blitz which you said meeks is against. What you should look for instead is more creative line play with more stunts and twists and other tactics to get pressure on the quarterback. You may give up some run fit gap integrity when you run a stunt for example but it also confuses the offensive blocking assignments as well. It comes down to your strong safety and linebaclers to fill the gaps and for players to try and maintain their gap assignments as much as possible.

blitzing to stop the run by way of filling gaps that are they because of the lack of Kemo's massive wall?

Link to comment

Kemo didn't generate any pressure so whoever replaces him won't likely generate less pressure necessitating more blitzing. We will most likely be getting more pressure at the expense of perhaps run stopping. As for zone blitzing schemes, that is still a blitz which you said meeks is against. What you should look for instead is more creative line play with more stunts and twists and other tactics to get pressure on the quarterback. You may give up some run fit gap integrity when you run a stunt for example but it also confuses the offensive blocking assignments as well. It comes down to your strong safety and linebaclers to fill the gaps and for players to try and maintain their gap assignments as much as possible.

blitzing to stop the run by way of filling gaps that are there because of the lack of Kemo's massive wall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that Meeks said that he plans to use the LBers to bring some pressure at times, but he doesn't want to rely on blitzes. I'm too lazy to look it up, but I think it was during OTA's that he mentioned that.

I could definitely see him using some run blitzes, assuming the Panthers can't adequately replace Kemo.

At any rate, I guess it's kind of good that kemo got hurt this early, if it was bound to happen. At least they have time to plan for it, unlike late last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any good DC will know how to game plan without Kemo. Really Kemo prob was not gonna have as big of a role this year as he did last year. Trgo really built our D around Kemo last year and without him Lewis could not shoot the gap to get pressure. I am a big fan of space eaters but Meeks seems to like smaller faster DTs. I mean Meeks was even wanting Kemo to run to the ball and thats how he got hurt. No one is gonna be allowed to slack this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemo didn't generate any pressure so whoever replaces him won't likely generate less pressure necessitating more blitzing. We will most likely be getting more pressure at the expense of perhaps run stopping. As for zone blitzing schemes, that is still a blitz which you said meeks is against. What you should look for instead is more creative line play with more stunts and twists and other tactics to get pressure on the quarterback. You may give up some run fit gap integrity when you run a stunt for example but it also confuses the offensive blocking assignments as well. It comes down to your strong safety and linebaclers to fill the gaps and for players to try and maintain their gap assignments as much as possible.

The good thing here is that we have three times the linebacking talent than Indy ever did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you guys on smaller tackles generate more pressure on the QB. Look at great pass ruhing tackles, most are 6'2" or shorter. I would not be surprised to see them move Peppers in the middle gaps in passing situations, which is something they did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...