Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darin Gantt's Panthers Draft Needs

El Chingon

By El Chingon,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

El Chingon Newbie

El Chingon

Posted
Posted

Hate him or love him, the guy knows Panther football.

 

Offensive tackle: Despite the fixation on what was left behind after the release of wide receiver Steve Smith (more on that later), the Panthers are actually thinner in the middle of the offense than they are on the perimeter.

When stalwart left tackle Jordan Gross retired, it left them with a bunch of bad options, the worst perhaps being moving right tackle Byron Bell (who was overmatched on the other side). But other than praying that a converted defensive tackle (Nate Chandler) can be a reliable starter, they don’t have any other options on the current roster, so they might have to cross their fingers and pray Cam Newton is still mobile at the end of the season.

They did a bit of sniffing around in free agency, and put in an offer for Anthony Collins before he signed with the Buccaneers. There’s not a starting-caliber left tackle on the market at the moment, and picking 28th might be too low to find one either. But if there’s not, they might be best-served holding their nose with Bell for a year and drafting an upgrade at right tackle, which wouldn’t be hard to find.

Defensive end: Stick with me here, and this was the case even before backup Frank Alexander’s four-game suspension.

Even though they have as good a pair of starters as any team in the league, the Panthers are also devoting more than 20 percent of their salary cap to Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy. That’s not long-term sustainable, and the kind of situation that could cripple a team if one of them is injured.

While Johnson is vastly overpaid, he’s at least consistently productive (44.0 sacks the last four seasons). Franchise-tagged Hardy is more explosive, but he’s only there for another year, and there’s a reasonable concern about giving the former sixth-rounder a gigantic long-term deal.

The Panthers need some cover for future years and depth for the short-term, so if the right guy is there in the first two rounds, you can’t discount them looking to keep a strength strong.

Wide receiver: Sure, it’s an issue.

But free agent pick-ups Jerricho Cotchery, Jason Avant and Tiquan Underwood are better able to get them through a game than what they’ve got at tackle.

The Panthers have a few kids they like at the position (such as Tavarres King and Marvin McNutt), but it’s clear they’re going to dip into one of the draft’s deepest positions, perhaps twice. It’s hard to imagine they’ll get through Friday without taking at least one.

Cornerback: Much like their receiving corps, there’s not much of not there.

But they proved last year they could get by with scraps in the secondary because of the strength of their defensive front seven.

They brought in veteran Antoine Cason, who has played well for Ron Rivera before. Otherwise, it’s more of the fill-ins from last year, minus the departed Captain Munnerlyn (Vikings) and Drayton Florence (unsigned). It’s not a good group, personnel wise. But it doesn’t have to be great for the Panthers to be effective.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/05/03/draft-needs-carolina-panthers/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

This confirms what I and many others have been saying about DE--if you are looking for a long-term deal before July 15, you may be disappointed.

 

If you consider the draft is not just for 2014 but for the long-term future (at least 4-5 years) then DE makes a lot of sense.

 

WR:  A good one in the second round, a RT in the third, depth at DB, OLB, and maybe WR later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

This confirms what I and many others have been saying about DE--if you are looking for a long-term deal before July 15, you may be disappointed.

If you consider the draft is not just for 2014 but for the long-term future (at least 4-5 years) then DE makes a lot of sense.

WR: A good one in the second round, a RT in the third, depth at DB, OLB, and maybe WR later.

Then Gettelmen fuged up and should have never tagged Hardy. If we take a DE after overhauling WR and losing Gross. Then it was a mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

Then Gettelmen fuged up and should have never tagged Hardy. If we take a DE after overhauling WR and losing Gross. Then it was a mistake.

I've disagreed with tagging Hardy. Only move I didn't like that Gettleman has made so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Experienced

La Pantera

Posted
Posted

i think if there is no long term deal reached with hardy this season (and i doubt there will be) then CJ will be a cap casualty next offseason. and GH will get his money. i wouldnt be shocked to see a DE this draft. i just hope like hell its not before the 3rd...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerVagyler Newbie

TylerVagyler

Posted
Posted

i think if there is no long term deal reached with hardy this season (and i doubt there will be) then CJ will be a cap casualty next offseason. and GH will get his money. i wouldnt be shocked to see a DE this draft. i just hope like hell its not before the 3rd...

 

Yep. If Hardy produces again and resigns, CJ is most likely gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerVagyler Newbie

TylerVagyler

Posted
Posted

I think it's hilarious Gantt has the same attitude about WRs as this franchise has had for the last several years.

 

"Yeah, it's a problem....but let's fix _________ first".

 

Eventually, we have to seriously address the issue.

 

 

(sorry for the triple post).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtnc Newbie

jtnc

Posted
Posted

I think it's hilarious Gantt has the same attitude about WRs as this franchise has had for the last several years.

"Yeah, it's a problem....but let's fix _________ first".

Eventually, we have to seriously address the issue.

(sorry for the triple post).

You mean the same Gantt who continues to praise Hurney to this day?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

We can franchise Hardy next year for 15.5 million so there is no reason we can't keep him for at least another year.  When he figures out we don't have to sign him to CJ money to get him to produce at a contract year level he might be more reasonable in getting a deal done.  He is chomping at the bit to make big money, maybe he will make a team friendly deal given he will be still be set for life. 

In the end getting him on a 2 year deal for 28 million and nothing up front isn't bad.  Lets see if he wants to sign next year as well.  That is how I hopes it goes.  Unless he falls off and then he will sign a deal with no problem if we want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • TD alt
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By TD alt · Posted

      OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...