Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

6th Round - Carolina selects RB Tyler Gaffney, Stanford

Ruff

By Ruff,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

I give Gettleman a A- first three rounds, and a big fat F the last four rounds. This is exactly what I would have drafted in rounds 4-7.

LT

RT

LG

CB.

Yes, 100%, unapologetic needs based drafting because thats how rounds 4-7 should be. NEED

You are 100% WRONG in how you pick late. You do NOT pick for need. You pick in athletic ability...many of these guys are your ST guys. Picking a shitty OT over a better athlete at EB or LB is dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Key word is "in the future"

It does nothing for us this year. You can't go into the season with six backs on the roster (Williams, Stewart, Barner, Gaffney, Tolbert, and Brockel).

Make 34 a June 1 cut....use that cap space to help get a T in FA

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
Posted

just read this on rotoworld fwiw

 

 

 

Gaffney projects as a No. 2 or 3 back in the pros, and may have to demonstrate special teams value to forge a long career. He's not going to push Jonathan Stewart, DeAngelo Williams or Kenjon Barner. May 10 - 5:03 PM

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Schit Newbie

King Schit

Posted
Posted

I'm riding with G-Man until I see a reason not to. Unfortunately for some of you, chill pills don't exist. What's crazy is that I predicted this in the "Draft's Bold Prediction" thread.

 

Correction: "Going Out on a Limb: NFL Draft" thread

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted

I can see him being like Alfred Morris. Not in terms of play style but type of production he can generate if given the starting role and good blocking

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

I think he's going to be more like Kenjon Barner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...