Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

6th Round - Carolina selects RB Tyler Gaffney, Stanford


Ruff

Recommended Posts

I feel good about this draft. Good depth AT THE VERY FUGGING LEAST. We get decimated by injury every year. Wouldn't you want to have somebody good to lean on while they develop? There are some near sighted motherfuggers on this board.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, i guess you would save a lot of money by not spending any on your OL. hurney sure saved a lot by not spending it on DTs.

 

I'm not sure what you're trying to be sarcastic about to be honest with you...I know it's there but I have no clue what you're actually trying to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet at least 2 ot's are brought in as udfa

this would appease me (as if anyone would care).

i want at least honest competition for the job and considering most of our OTs were pulled from the udfa scrap heap, it makes sense that we would bring in more from the same scrap heap to compete.

i just wish the role was valued more than just throwing udfas at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course perhaps some of you are a little too positive with every draft we have.  Kind of like how on family fued, the family are always saying "good answer, good answer" to some dumb answers.  A lot of you love the Kugz pick last year.  How's that working for you now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course perhaps some of you are a little too positive with every draft we have. Kind of like how on family fued, the family are always saying "good answer, good answer" to some dumb answers. A lot of you love the Kugz pick last year. How's that working for you now?

The Kug pick is still an unknown. None of us know what he is gonna be...he was injured last season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Kug pick is still an unknown. None of us know what he is gonna be...he was injured last season.

 

For some crazy reason his injury in itself was predictable.  You just know this pick is a wasted pick.  At best he will simply be depth for us.  Amini and Trai will be our starters going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...