Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I didnt read all 200 posts, but I read some of you sounding relieved, as if the girl was the problem. While that could turn out to be true, Just because Hardy called 911 and told his side of the story to the dispatcher, do not think that is evidence of innocence. It sounds convincing and is good news from that perspective, but the judge saw the bruises and marks on her body. The judge felt that the female was the victim. The legal expert who felt that the girl had been assaulted will not be a petty detail that can easily be overlooked.

She was drunk and high, and both his friend and Hardy were defending themselves. When a guy grabs a girl to restrain her bruises result. Hell some times when me and my girl are playing around I cause bruises by accident.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that irks me about the result from this is the judge ordered Hardy to go to AA meetings three times a week, as if he's already been deemed guilty of something.

Sent from my iPhone.

If she didn't his lawyer may have told him to go anyway. It is a way to proactively keep any punishment lower if this doesn't get dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She was drunk and high, and both his friend and Hardy were defending themselves. When a guy grabs a girl to restrain her bruises result. Hell some times when me and my girl are playing around I cause bruises by accident.

 

There is also another 911 call that has a female voice saying that she saw him beating her. I want to give Hardy the benefit of the doubt, but nobody knows what happened.  Sure, Hardy may have restrained her at one point, but he could have thrown her around at another point.   Question:  Was he retraining her around her neck?

 

If you are saying that she was drunk and high, then I would have to ask, "Where are you getting that information?"  Was Hardy drunk and/or high and what does that prove anyway?

 

I hope you are right, Snake.  I really do.  However, if you are not, I want the truth to be told and the real victim cleared and protected.

 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also another 911 call that has a female voice saying that she saw him beating her. I want to give Hardy the benefit of the doubt, but nobody knows what happened.  Sure, Hardy may have restrained her at one point, but he could have thrown her around at another point. 

 

If you are saying that she was drunk and high, then I would have to ask, "Where are you getting that information?"  Was Hardy drunk and/or high and what does that prove anyway?

 

I hope you are right, Snake.  I really do.  However, if you are not, I want the truth to be told and the real victim cleared and protected.

 

 

I'm pretty sure it was reported that they were both intoxicated. I am not sure where that info came from exactly.

 

You can tell from the door mans call that he is fairly questioning of the drunk lady yelling over his phone call. She says one second she was in there and saw in and the next that she heard it from the hall or something to that affect.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure it was reported that they were both intoxicated. I am not sure where that info came from exactly.

 

Based on the 911 call, Hardy seemed a bit slurry in speech, but aware.  Funny how people assume that she is guilty because she was drunk/high but give GH, a known lunatic, credit for being sensible and proactive. They are basing that on Hardy's statement to the 911 dispatcher.   I do not buy it.  However, that is not enough to convict him on either.  If Snake is right, if it was just restraint, lets see where those bruises were.  I understand bruises above the elbow on the arms.  Maybe at the wrists.  But if they were around the throat, he has a unique way of dealing with angry women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the 911 call, Hardy seemed a bit slurry in speech, but aware.  Funny how people assume that she is guilty because she was drunk/high but give GH, a known lunatic, credit for being sensible and proactive. They are basing that on Hardy's statement to the 911 dispatcher.   I do not buy it.  However, that is not enough to convict him on either.  If Snake is right, if it was just restraint, lets see where those bruises were.  I understand bruises above the elbow on the arms.  Maybe at the wrists.  But if they were around the throat, he has a unique way of dealing with angry women.

 

We don't know anything about the true extent of the bruises. We know there was something and it was enough for there to be misdemeanor charges brought and an investigation should get to the bottom of it. 

 

i find it a little odd that she went to the courthouse during his appearance but did not actually appear in front of the judge. If she is terrified of him why be there? It's certainly a good image to show her in public with a sling and big dark sunglasses. Though she never said anything about having facial injuries.

 

Anything is possible but I am hoping our star player did not pummel a woman. The court will figure it out though.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know anything about the true extent of the bruises. We know there was something and it was enough for there to be misdemeanor charges brought and an investigation should get to the bottom of it.

i find it a little odd that she went to the courthouse during his appearance but did not actually appear in front of the judge. If she is terrified of him why be there? It's certainly a good image to show her in public with a sling and big dark sunglasses. Though she never said anything about having facial injuries.

Anything is possible but I am hoping our star player did not pummel a woman. The court will figure it out though.

I question why weren't the bruises at the scene not good enough for a arrest at that point?

Why if he had thrown her on Loaded "weapons" was he allowed to go back in his house and not be arrested until 7 hours later??

We are talking about a drunk giant with loaded weapons right??

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know anything about the true extent of the bruises. We know there was something and it was enough for there to be misdemeanor charges brought and an investigation should get to the bottom of it. 

 

i find it a little odd that she went to the courthouse during his appearance but did not actually appear in front of the judge. If she is terrified of him why be there? It's certainly a good image to show her in public with a sling and big dark sunglasses. Though she never said anything about having facial injuries.

 

Anything is possible but I am hoping our star player did not pummel a woman. The court will figure it out though.

 

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail. 

 

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female.  There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail. 

 

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female.  There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call. 

We don't know that the judge found them disturbing. We know she found the evidence to be worth filing the charges. That doesn't take much in domestic violence cases does it? She could have had a scratch and it would have likely led to charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail.

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female. There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call.

But she saw Bruises 4 or 5 hours later. The police at the scene didn't seem to think the bruises were enough to arrest anybody. Plus she refused medical help at the scene.

Where did she go after the police showed up at 4:18 when the couple were separated?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that the judge, a female judge, determined the bruises to be disturbing and put Hardy in jail. 

 

I am not trying to convict our top DE, but that means little to me if he was hitting a female.  There is evidence that suggests Hardy was not as innocent as he appears on the 911 call. 

 

The judge didnt put Hardy in jail.  It is mandatory for Domestic abuse accused to stay in jail for 24 hours.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The judge didnt put Hardy in jail.  It is mandatory for Domestic abuse accused to stay in jail for 24 hours.

Exactly.

 

The magistrate/judge has no choice but to set a court date once the evidence is brought before the court by the arresting officers.  It is now the states job to prove Hardy is guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get it's subjective and I said "PFF rated him as" one of the top deep ball passers during that time, which is an accurate statement.  They are still a group of professionals that look at film and data in order to make their judgements/ratings.  These people whose data has been incorporated into a lot of teams' staffs view Bryce's deep throws as some of the best in the league during that stretch.  That tells me that he can probably throw a deep pass vs the Huddle's version of he is small and didn't do it his rookie year so he must not be able to.  That and literally seeing him do it just makes me feel he is more than capable of doing so.   Do you think PFF is skewing their opinion to prop up a QB in a bottom tier franchise?  It's just another group's opinion and I feel is pretty respected around the league currently.  It's not the gospel truth or anything.  
    • I still remember how happy I was that gettlegut was not the GM once he picked Jones, that was a firing pick and well..... If not for the raiders drafting Clelin Ferrell, it was the biggest draft day mistake in the last 20 some years. 
    • He had 251 passing yards. 3 passing touchdowns and 2 rushing touchdowns. All in all a very impressive game. Problem is I do not envision his rushing ability translating like that over the course of the upcoming season. Yeah it will be something to account for from time to time but one it's not sustainable and two you don't want to put his durability to the ultimate test against a motivated defender willing to take a penalty and a fine. And plus with our backfield. Two 1k yard rushers. That's what they're here for. Then we have a much improved WR room. That means Bryce has to elevate those passing numbers substantially. The fact of the matter is regardless of circumstances it did take him 23 games to surpass Kyle Allen's single season passing yardage from 13 games in 2020. And that is not a high bar by any means. Whatever QB tier Bryce ends up in from here amongst his peers this upcoming season when it's all said and done it will be with his arm.
×
×
  • Create New...