Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sure, if you want your eyes scratched out. Crazy women on hard drugs = more dangerous than a rabid badger named Ditka.

 

 

But they were HOLDING her.  How can she scratch anyone if they're holding her?  They're two grown-ass men.

 

And how many scratches exactly did Hardy and his partner have on them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she really was on hard drugs it would make sense for her to refuse treatment on her scratches and bruising. 

 

Bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After listening to both those calls, unless I see some pictures of this girl and she looks like she's been beat to hell, I'm not buying it.   Sounds like they got in an argument, girl went nuts, whoever was there while Hardy was on the phone with 911 tries to restrain her, not unreasonable.   Girl that keeps interrupting the second call... well, not even the guy who called 911 buys what she is saying. 

 

However, Hardy made the decision to surround himself with people like this.  If she's doing coke I'm sure he was well aware of it.  None of this looks good for Hardy, but I don't think he beat the crap out of the girl.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think given the circumstances with her trying to hurt herself to make it look like he did it they wanted her there when the police arrived so they could see that she was unharmed.

 

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I read that she WASN'T there when the police arrived.

 

She was already out of the apartment.

 

So, if that is true (and somebody correct me if I'm not), then they obviously got her out of the apartment.

 

So if they got her out of the apartment, how come they needed the police to come to get her out of the apartment?

 

And if they were able to get her out of the apartment, how come they needed to "hold her down"?

 

There are still as many questions not answered on one side as the other.

 

But, yeah... crazy psycho bitch, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they were HOLDING her.  How can she scratch anyone if they're holding her?  They're two grown-ass men.

 

And how many scratches exactly did Hardy and his partner have on them?

 

Here, let me give my 10 year old a bag of mike and ikes and you try to hold him down for a few minutes.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I read that she WASN'T there when the police arrived.

 

She was already out of the apartment.

 

So, if that is true (and somebody correct me if I'm not), then they obviously got her out of the apartment.

 

So if they got her out of the apartment, how come they needed the police to come to get her out of the apartment?

 

And if they were able to get her out of the apartment, how come they needed to "hold her down"?

 

There are still as many questions not answered on one side as the other.

 

But, yeah... crazy psycho bitch, of course.

1) She was obviously in the apartment when the 911 call was made.

2) The manager was apparently holding her back from attacking Hardy further

 

Hardy should file domestic battery charges against her lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) She was obviously in the apartment when the 911 call was made.

2) The manager was apparently holding her back from attacking Hardy further

 

Hardy should file domestic battery charges against her lol

 

 

Anyone who believes anything is "apparent' or "obvious" in this entire thing so far is easily convinced.

 

For some reason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The girl in the neighbor call said she was there and saw it. Although, she sounded drunk and like a moron.

 

At the end, the neighbor tells the operator he has no idea what the drunk girl's name is when asked, and that it's the first time he's ever seen her and that she's obviously inebriated. He says she came down to his apartment and told him to call 911. It was probably one of Butler's friends that had gone with her. They were all drunk and making a scene.

 

And in Hardy's call, one of the first things he said was that his neighbor had seen everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...