Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Many Years Do You Give MKG?

CarolinaPanthers8789

Recommended Posts

CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Simple question...

How many years do you give MKG to develop a jump shot before you move on (via letting him walk in free agency or trade) or relegate him to a back-up position?

Do you wait until Big Al retires, since MKG helps mask some of Al's defensive deficiencies or do you try to find a player who is both good offensively and defensively in the next one to two years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wareagleflyboy Newbie

wareagleflyboy

Posted
Posted

MKG will not be an all star even if he develops a jumper. He does not have the scoring acumen to be such. 

I disagree, I think his lack of jumper hurts his inside game right now.  He could develop a jumper, then people would be wary of his shot and pump fake more.  This will allow him to really show off his slashing ability that you already see flashes of.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMostInterestingMan Mentor

TheMostInterestingMan

Posted
Posted

MKG will not be an all star even if he develops a jumper. He does not have the scoring acumen to be such.

The kid is fantastic at getting to the rim and scoring. The problem is, he can't stretch defenders outside so they just close off lanes and dare him to shoot. His athletic ability is off the charts. If he can get a decent jumpshot then he is more than capable of being an all star type player

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

The question is what return can we get from MKG that would make it worth giving up on him?

I don't see a lottery team giving up their draft pick for him. We might tempt a team in the mid first round to give up a pick, perhaps Chicago with one of their two, or maybe a team like OKC if they want a guy that can bring defense and a project shooter. But is that enough to make us give up on him?

I'm not convinced. The kid had a ton of talent, and if he can develop a jump shot and offensively in general, then he will be a very good player for this team. He's still very young, and he should be given the time to improve. What I could see us doing if we keep our draft picks is looking at a scorer like McDermott in the lottery or Warren later on. But I'd like to see MKG stay here because hopefully with more coaching he'll develop into the star he was drafted to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MV%doe Newbie

MV%doe

Posted
Posted

Its different for all, but even after two full years there should be some sign of hope. The best improvement most times comes after the first full year, that second pre-season should be the biggest improvement of ones career. I have a fairly good eye for b-ball, mkg needs to train his mental jumper also. Who knows how long that will take, few have suddenly gotten a good jumper 10 years later after having a poor one for nine. Azria seemed to find his long/mid/overall jumper after years of being a driver. Remember mkgs age is still very young, at least he's a hard worker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yasuhara2241 Contributor

yasuhara2241

Posted
Posted

Have I missed the rule that all of the players on the team need to be All-Stars? I can bet that the Heat and the Spurs could use a player like MKG on their roster so why can't we?

 

I think we are all blinded by the #2 that we are failing to realize that a NBA roster has many different players of different strengths and quality. Now I for one am not willing to say if he doesn't learn to shoot than get rid of him because his defense is obviously a huge asset for us as a team.

 

I am also not willing to say that we shouldn't try to upgrade the position because if we aren't looking to get better what's the point.

 

The fact is this, there are uses for the MKGs and Zellers of the world. They have potential and if they reach it jackpot, if they don't we have 2 quality reserves which gives us a great deal of depth in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...