Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Crotchery truly is the replacement to LaFell


Rags

Recommended Posts

Guest NEMasshole

LaFell doesn't look very good and is our 4th/5th recieving option and you somehow managed to downgrade on him , good luck for the season :lolu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell doesn't look very good and is our 4th/5th recieving option and you somehow managed to downgrade on him , good luck for the season :lolu:

 

We have a Pats troll now. Hey guy, how convenient of you to sign up today. Where were you last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell doesn't look very good and is our 4th/5th recieving option and you somehow managed to downgrade on him , good luck for the season :lolu:

 

Just go to the smack forums fatty if you have nothing better to do on a Friday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cotchery and Avant were pretty much no-shows this game.  Cam had some time, but obviously neither of them could get open.  

 

Say what you want, but we need a more dynamic receiver to play on the other side of Benjamin. Cotchery and Avant are better suited to be WR3s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm drunk I can't be expected spell right.

 

And yes, I know it' preseason, but he has't shown up in any game. O-line was poo tonight but a few of hose sacks are were cveage sacks.

 

Though that could equally be because Shula's dumbass routes. idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...