Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF now Loves Keuchly

bababoey

By bababoey,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

bababoey Enthusiast

bababoey

Posted
Posted

PFF, who last year said Keuchly was overrated and the MVP should have gone to Sherman or Watt, now has gotten on board the Keuchly bandwagon.  All it took was a Defensive Rookie of the Year award and a Defensive MVP award to show them maybe he is a little better than they thought.  The reference to Luke is at the very bottom.

 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/09/15/refo-lions-panthers-week-2/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

PFF, who last year said Keuchly was overrated and the MVP should have gone to Sherman or Watt, now has gotten on board the Keuchly bandwagon.  All it took was a Defensive Rookie of the Year award and a Defensive MVP award to show them maybe he is a little better than they thought.  The reference to Luke is at the very bottom.

 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/09/15/refo-lions-panthers-week-2/

Watt and Sherman were both incredible players, and Watt is maybe the best player in the NFL period. They never once said Kuechly isn't a good player, just that there were players that had better years.

 

You people are fuging passive aggressive as hell about anyone in the national media. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

 

I just can't take PFF seriously. Their top 5 QBs through last night (yes, includes yesterday's games):

 

Matt Ryan
Ryan Tannehill
Aaron Rodgers
Colin "Squidward" Kaepernick 
Ryan Fitzpatrick
 
...wat.

 

 

Wait a minute....you mean to tell me with only 12% of the NFL season done stats are wonky and haven't leveled out yet? That things aren't going to change as the year goes on? 

 

You're probably one of those people that thought jeff francoeur was going to bat .400 his entire career too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted

Wait a minute....you mean to tell me with only 12% of the NFL season done stats are wonky and haven't leveled out yet? That things aren't going to change as the year goes on? 

 

You're probably one of those people that thought jeff francoeur was going to bat .400 his entire career too. 

 

 

LOL....Pie for the Francoeur reference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
Posted

Wait a minute....you mean to tell me with only 12% of the NFL season done stats are wonky and haven't leveled out yet? That things aren't going to change as the year goes on? 

 

You're probably one of those people that thought jeff francoeur was going to bat .400 his entire career too. 

 

1. I don't follow baseball. Boring ass sport.

 

2. I don't need the entire season to know that Ryan fuging Tannehill is not the 2nd best QB in the NFL. ESPN's QBR has Tannehill ranked 34th of 35 QBs. Why the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

Somebody explain their points system to me... I am not familiar with how they do that.

They track individual performances, judge them on a series of metrics, then give them a +/- based on the average performance at their position, or how positively/negatively they impacted the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

1. I don't follow baseball. Boring ass sport.

 

2. I don't need 12% of the season to know that Ryan fuging Tannehill is not the 2nd best QB in the NFL. ESPN's QBR has Tannehill ranked 34th of 35 QBs. Why the difference?

1. Do you follow statistics? Or is that a boring ass math?

 

2. He's started off very efficiently and there isn't a lot of good QB play so far this year. It will level off. PFF doesn't rank off of what we all know. Of course Tannehill isn't the 2nd best QB in the league. But they have a system in place and based on the production of the first two weeks Tannehill is doing pretty well compared to the rest of the league.

 

This isn't very difficult to figure out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

Wait a minute....you mean to tell me with only 12% of the NFL season done stats are wonky and haven't leveled out yet? That things aren't going to change as the year goes on?

You're probably one of those people that thought jeff francoeur was going to bat .400 his entire career too.

You're speaking to a forum full of people that thought Jake Delhomme was going to throw 45 touchdowns in 2007 because he had really productive games against the Rams and Texans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      PANTHERS @ HURRICANES ROUND 3 GAME 1

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • PantherChris
      RODS gotta GO

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • woahfraze
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By woahfraze · Posted

      Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...