Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

a whole lot of kuechly love from the steelers (w/ a little for TD as well)


rayzor

Recommended Posts

i was bored and couldn't sleep and i found this gem while perusing through a thread on a steelers forum.

 

very good read, imo.

 

excerpt:

 

The Force Is With This One

Over the last two seasons combined, the Panthers rank fourth in the NFL against the run and fifth overall defensively.

Remember those good ol' days, Steelers fans?

 

Yes, while the Steelers were finishing up their era of elite defensive standing, the Panthers ranked 24th overall in the 2010-11 seasons combined.

 

The seemingly abrupt change in the Panthers' defensive rankings over these last few years is due mainly to the drafting of middle linebacker Luke Kuechly with the ninth pick in 2012.

 

The NCAA's No. 2 all-time leading tackler (532) in only three seasons at Boston College, the Cincinnati-born Kuechly came to the NFL with the following names attached to the awards he received after his junior season: Dick Butkus, Vince Lombardi, Bronko Nagursky, Ronnie Lott and Jack Lambert.

 

Yes, there IS a Lambert Award for linebackers, but it's not likely Jack made a personal visit to Boston College to hand Kuechly his trophy the way Butkus did.

 

"I played against him," Steelers tight end Rob Blanchflower said of UMass's 45-17 loss to Boston College in 2011. "I just remember being very impressed with Kuechly and how good of an athlete he was, always making plays, coverage, blitzing. He was good at everything."

 

"I don't remember too much," Steelers running back Dri Archer said of Kent State's 26-13 loss to Boston College in 2010. "But I know we had a big game plan for him. He was just like he is now, but he's even better now."

 

"He's a great player," said Steelers linebacker Sean Spence. "Him being in the ACC I saw him play a lot. I had a chance to play against him. He's everything that everybody says."

.

.

.

"Luke Kuechly is quite simply one of the best in the business," said Mike Tomlin. "I think he is legitimately in the argument of a J.J. Watt in terms of some of the most exciting young football players in our game. There’s nothing that he can’t do. He is good at blitzing. He is good versus backs when he gets on running backs. Backs have a problem from a protection standpoint. He is a sideline-to-sideline tackler. He has innate instincts. He can slip blocks. He can defeat blocks physically. He is great in the passing game in zones and man. There is really nothing he can’t do. He doesn’t have many holes in his game as a linebacker."

 

"And you've got Thomas Davis right next to him," said Haley. "Those two are really the cornerstone of the defense as you watch on tape. They're in the middle of the action down in and down out. Up front they have a great rotation. But I would say it starts with 59 in the middle."

 

Davis, the weakside OLB in the Panthers' 4-3, leads the team with 22 tackles, with Kuechly trailing by three. Last season, Kuechly made 176 tackles to lead Davis and the rest of the team by 25.

 

read the whole thing: http://pit.scout.com/story/1453103-the-force-is-with-this-one?s=68#/story/1453103-the-force-is-with-this-one?s=68

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rk Year Rnd Pick Player Pos

1 2012 1 1 Andrew Luck QB

2 2012 1 2 Robert Griffin QB

3 2012 1 3 Trent Richardson RB

4 2012 1 4 Matt Kalil OL

5 2012 1 5 Justin Blackmon WR

6 2012 1 6 Morris Claiborne DB

7 2012 1 7 Mark Barron SS

8 2012 1 8 Ryan Tannehill QB

9 2012 1 9 Luke Kuechly LB

Edited to make it more aesthetically pleasing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rk Year Rnd Pick Player Pos

1 2012 1 1 Andrew Luck QB

2 2012 1 2 Robert Griffin QB

3 2012 1 3 Trent Richardson RB

4 2012 1 4 Matt Kalil OL

5 2012 1 5 Justin Blackmon WR

6 2012 1 6 Morris Claiborne DB

7 2012 1 7 Mark Barron SS

8 2012 1 8 Ryan Tannehill QB

9 2012 1 9 Luke Kuechly LB

Edited to make it more aesthetically pleasing

 

 

SO instead it would look something like

 

1. Colts: Andrew Luck

2. Redskins: Russel Wilson

3. Browns: Robert Griffin III

4. Vikings: Luke Kuechly

5. Jaguars: Josh Gordon

6. Cowboys: Matt Kalil

7. Bucs: Ryan Tannehill

8. Dolphins: Nick Foles

9. Panthers: Dontari Poe/Alshon Jeffery/ Kendall Wright/Michael Floyd/Riley Reiff...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Indy was going to take Luck and I highly doubt anything could dissuade Redskins from taking Griffin, so it's just the 6 other teams that screwed up by not taking Luke

 

i would say the redskins screwed up by taking griffin and moving up to get him the way they did, esp. when they picked up the better QB several rounds later.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SO instead it would look something like

1. Colts: Andrew Luck

2. Redskins: Russel Wilson

3. Browns: Robert Griffin III

4. Vikings: Luke Kuechly

5. Jaguars: Josh Gordon

6. Cowboys: Matt Kalil

7. Bucs: Ryan Tannehill

8. Dolphins: Nick Foles

9. Panthers: Dontari Poe/Alshon Jeffery/ Kendall Wright/Michael Floyd/Riley Reiff...?

Josh Gordon was ineligible so the only way he could have been selected was via supplementary draft.

In terms of BPA Kuechly goes to the Skins.

I still laugh on game days thinking about my reaction to the Panthers picking a middle linebacker we "didn't need" at 9.

That draft could have been scary good for the Bucs had they taken Kuechly over Barron. They followed that up with Doug Martin late in the first and Lavonte David in the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thomas Davis needs some love!  He is the yin to Kuechly's yang and our defense is built on these two.  One is not great without the other!  They are fuel for each other and thrive off each other's play on the field.

 

I am getting a TD jersey now…I want to specially make a jersey that has TD on one side and Keeks on the other half…the two combined is why our defense is so special!!!!

 

WT…heck was that video about…I couldn't get past the first 10 seconds…..yeesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Summary Week 1 looked a lot like the last couple of years and that's not good. A whole lot of "blah" all around. Losing Turk might be big. Him not being on the DL was not the reason for JAX's run game success on Sunday, but proved to be a better run stopper than anticipated. Valued part of the overhauled DL and it's never good to be immediately out after going down. Hopefully isn't as bad as anticipated but definitely severe enough for him to be out 4 - 6 weeks. Kaye thinks that Bryce got off to a really good start and that his weapons, sans TMac, let him down regularly though Bryce had his own blunders as well. Also felt that he was much worse after the weather delay. OL wasn't particularly good either. Guys were getting out of the huddle late and snapping the ball with very little time remaining. Extended drives that shouldn't have been that long (goes into detail later about this). Bryce is fine but does have to be better and this did look more like a regressive moment rather than progressive. Might have overvalued the finish to the season due to not having much to play for other than be spoilers. PFF offensive and passing grades were discussed. ADOT: 8.8yds - Not great, but not dump it off Bryce that we saw in 2024 ACP - 70%. (ngl, as much as people complain about BTTs being a made up stat it's very difficult for me to take the adjusted completion percentage stat seriously). 12 pressures - Not a way to operate as a QB. Only took 1 sack officially but this means he has to run around to try and get the ball out on time. 8/15 on 3rd down, over 50% is healthy for an offense All of that said, there was still 3 turnovers and operational issues on the offense (getting out of the huddle late, getting the snap off late, snap issues, etc). Bryce as a passer on Sunday was okay, but as a QB he was not good. Had multiple drives ~5min each when trailing by a score or two. Third drive of the game that took place in Q2 lasted 4:53 the team gained 39yds and got two first downs before punting. Took off roughly 1/3rd of the quarter, effectively running the clock out on themselves. Second one took 5:15 and that led to 55yds net (29yds in actual scrimmage, 26yds from penalties) and was the one that ended at 4th & 1 on the JAX 5. They had another drive that 4:10 where they gained 10yds net and got one first down. How can they operate eating away into their own opportunities? Gave 3 possessions to the opposing team and spent what was basically an entire quarter just burning clock. Poor clock management. What happened on Sunday cannot happen again in Arizona. Game should be close and they cannot afford to squander opportunities especially with a defense that gives up the rushing yardage that they do. TMac looked really good and showed a lot of flash. XL... this is back-to-back really good summers but man you have to have some situational awareness. His rookie season was greatly underrated considering what he did in the first half of it. Bryce had a couple of throws that weren't turnovers that he'd want back ie: slot fade to Renfrow, 4th & 1 ball that he just threw up. Physically he was very effective as a passer, but from the mental/decision making side he was not as good. 4th & 1 from the 5 you need to get, give it to Chuba. Yea they stopped it twice before but if Chuba is the guy that is going to make the offense run you've got to go to him. Neither Mike nor Alex would've gone with an empty set in that situation. Passing game was just not working: guys were dropping passes, mis-running routes, not paying attention properly (like not turning their heads). Wouldn't put that on Bryce given how him and the offense were ineffective for the first three quarters. It was the right call to go for it on 4th & 1.  Pivoting to the defense, the run defense is still bad when looking at the numbers. During just the Dave Canales era, the Panthers' defense has allowed 200+ rushing yards nine times (including in seven consecutive games). Even in wins they are getting the ball ran on them heavily. In 35 games as the Panthers DC, Evero's defense has given up 200+ rushing yards 26 times. Only nine games have been under that amount. This scheme does a good job with coverage, especially on the outside, but it's been three years of allowed rushing success. It'd be one thing if they were sacrificing run defense for a pass rush, but not having any pressure in this game while also giving up 200+ yards is very frustrating. Isn't because of being a 3-4 defense, otherwise other 3-4 defenses would have the same issues. Young guys on the defensive side of the ball got very limited opportunities vs. veterans even if the veterans were failing. Evero's history does not play into playing young guys early. DJ Wonnum isn't exactly a Pro Bowl pass rusher that can't leave the field, neither is Pat Jones II, and Nick Scott certainly isn't. If those guys aren't ready, what on the field showed you that the guys that are playing are ready? Moehrig had a rough day in pass coverage. Coen had the TEs targeted often against him. Jaycee Horn + Mike Jackson have been terrific and the scheme benefits them, and while Nick Scott wasn't terrible he's still a replacement level player. A 30yr old safety with limited upside playing on the backend over Lathan Ransom who had a great summer or Demani Richardson who had a great season last year is being antithetical to what Canales says about playing and teaching none guys. Canales said he was going to push for it and people are asking why he doesn't just big boy Evero, but Evero was retained and is the guy for the defense. Scourton and Umanmielen have a lot of potential. Last season's team had no talent on the defense and no depth, but now that they've got these young guys he's not playing them. Hard to be championed as an awesome head coaching candidate if he won't play the kids. "Who have they developed on defense over the last three years?" Yeesh... Mike's got a point. Alex responds that Demani is a guy, but he didn't get to play much at all last week. I'm a little over halfway through but gotta pick up dinner for the family. Will try to finish up tonight or tomorrow morning.
    • Only truly stupid or ignorant people disliked Cam Newton. He made our franchise relevant he tried to change the culture despite constantly being criticized for hating to lose. He looked the part out of the gate in a lockout year too. He was the complete opposite of what we have now. There is zero culture here. Just guys who make hollow generic statements over and over. I have no idea how anyone that isn't under the influence of something could draw parallels to the prime Cam era with that we have now. It's honestly offensive 🤷‍♂️
    • That’s because Panther fans love to dismantle their football players. They live in a constant state of misery. Look at what they did with Cam, one of the greatest athletes in Panther history.
×
×
  • Create New...