Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ferrari QB used like a '85 Camry


lindseyj14

Recommended Posts

Wouldn't shock me if it eventually comes out that Cam rejected an extension over the summer. I know he'll never say anything publicly but he can't be happy here. He's a once in a lifetime talent and he's being wasted. And he knows it. Team has given him ONE offensive player in 4 years and they continue to use him like he's Trent Dilfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our Ferrari has a dent in the side and is running on 5 cylinders.

 

This.  Cam is starting to show the effects of being the most hit QB in the NFL since he entered the league.  We've been using our Ferrari in demolition derbies for too long.  I just hope he hasn't and won't developed some injuries that are going to linger down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam's ankle is not right. It's obvious. At this point, he's not mobile. The Steelers knew that, anyone could see it. Get over it.

Steelers knew our OL was poo and that if they blitzed heavy then our weak WRs would struggle to get open until after they got pressure

Cam gimpy is still more mobile than most of league

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...